Skip to content

When Do Retailers Have To Honour Incorrectly Priced Items?

As a retail business owner, you are responsible for many regulatory and compliance issues, including ensuring you accurately price your items. Unfortunately, a business may incorrectly price an item in the day-to-day rush. When this happens, retailers and consumers are often unsure of their legal obligations and rights and whether they must sell their goods at the erroneous price. This article explains when a retailer must honour incorrectly priced items.

Pricing Obligations in the Australian Consumer Law

In Australia, the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) governs consumer law and practices. The ACL requires prices to be clear and correct so that they do not mislead consumers and to represent the total price of the product or service. Additionally, advertisements must not leave consumers with a false impression regarding pricing.

Correct pricing is important because accurate prices help consumers make informed decisions in the marketplace. The ACL puts these consumer protections around pricing into place because consumers generally have less power than large retailers. In ensuring clear rules about pricing and pricing practices, the ACL deters businesses from engaging in less-than-ideal pricing practices.

For example, suppose a company is selling television sets and decides to have a sale. They advertise the sale price at $700 and claim that the original price was $900. However, they have always sold their television sets for $700. The $900 original price was false advertising to make potential consumers believe they were purchasing at a bargain. The ACL prohibits this practice, as it deceives the consumer who relies on the retailer for their information.

Products Displayed With Incorrect Price

If a retailer incorrectly prices one isolated product, it is likely an error. A retailer can follow their individual store policy to address the mistake in these cases. This means a store may or may not honour incorrectly priced items depending on their policy and will not have to sell the product at the wrong price. Store policies are usually displayed at the cash register or contained in terms and conditions (for online businesses).

Particular codes of practice may guide some stores’ policies. For example, Woolworths is a signatory to the Code of Practice for Computerised Checkout Systems in Supermarkets. This Code outlines specific procedures a store must follow for incorrectly priced items. For example, suppose a customer scans an item in Woolworths for a higher price than the price listed on the shelf. In that case, the customer can receive the item free (assuming the look-up number is correct). The Code is voluntary and aims to ensure that supermarket scanning systems do not diminish consumer rights.

If a retailer deliberately prices an item incorrectly, this may amount to misleading or deceptive conduct. As a result, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) may initiate legal action.

Front page of publication
The Ultimate Guide to Starting an Online Business

It’s now easier than ever to start a business online. But growing and sustaining an online business requires a great deal of attention and planning.

This How to Start an Online Business Manual covers all the essential topics you need to know about starting your online business.

The publication also includes eight case studies featuring leading Australian businesses and online influencers.

Download Now

Products Displayed With Multiple Prices

If a retailer displays an item with multiple prices, they must sell the product at the lower of the marked or displayed prices. If they do not wish to do this for commercial reasons, they must withdraw the good from sale until they correct the price. This rule also applies if a retailer advertises a product at multiple prices. However, a retailer does not have to sell a product at the lowest advertised price or withdraw it from sale if in the advertisement:

  • the retailer states that prices will vary by region;
  • another price completely obscures the relevant price;
  • the retailer provides a unit price; or
  • the retailer gives the price in a foreign currency.

If a retailer wishes to change the displayed price of a product in a catalogue or advertisement, they must:

  • retract the display price; and
  • publish the retraction to have a similar circulation or audience to the advertisement.

‘Two-Price Comparison’ Advertising

Retailers should exercise caution when advertising prices in a ‘two-price comparison’ manner. This kind of pricing includes:

  • a retailer advertising a previous price with ‘was/now’ or ‘strike through’ or specifies a dollar amount or percentage saving;
  • cost or wholesale price;
  • competitor’s price; or
  • the recommended retail price.

This type of advertising can easily mislead customers about the savings they can achieve. For example, a ‘was/now’ advertisement may mislead a consumer if the retailer did not sell the product at the ‘before’ price in a reasonable period before the sale.

Misleading advertising is an offence under ACL, regardless of whether the retailer intended to mislead customers. Therefore, retailers must exercise due caution. As their intention is legally irrelevant, a retailer can breach the law even though they believed the statement was true when they made it. The ACCC recommends that businesses keep complete records substantiating all two-price comparison claims.  

Misleading Drip Pricing Practices

Retailers must be upfront and disclose the full price of a product or service, including extra fees. ‘Drip pricing’ is when a retailer advertises a price at the beginning of an online purchase but adds additional charges (such as booking and service fees) through the purchase process, resulting in consumers paying more than initially intended. This may amount to misleading or deceptive conduct under the ACL if retailers do not disclose the types of fees that will apply and when at the start of the purchasing process. 

Key Takeaways

If incorrectly priced items mislead consumers, this is a serious offence under the Australian Consumer Law. Generally, if a retailer displays multiple prices, they should honour the lower price. Similarly, using ‘two-price’ comparison pricing may be misleading, and retailers should exercise caution by keeping comprehensive records that justify such comparative claims. Pricing may also be misleading where there is ‘drip pricing’ and retailers cause consumers to pay more than they expected. However, if an isolated product is incorrectly priced, a retailer often has the option of following their store policy. Overall, retailers should consistently exercise best practice and clearly display their sales terms and conditions at the register. 

If you need help pricing your products correctly, our experienced advertising compliance lawyers can assist as part of our LegalVision membership. For a low monthly fee, you will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents. Call us today on 1300 544 755 or visit our membership page.

Register for our free webinars

Managing Psychosocial Risks: Employer and Legal Counsel Responsibilities

Online
Protect your business by managing workplace psychosocial risks. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Franchisor Compliance Update: Code Obligations from November 2025

Online
Stay compliant with the new franchising updates from November 2025. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Avoiding NDIS Pitfalls: Key Breaches and How to Prevent Them

Online
Understand NDIS pitfalls and reduce the risk of breaches affecting your business. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Demystifying M&A: What Every Business Owner Should Know

Online
Understand the essentials of mergers and acquisitions and protect your business value. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now
See more webinars >
Danielle Pedersen

Danielle Pedersen

Lawyer | View profile

Danielle is a Lawyer at LegalVision in the Corporate and Commercial team. She regularly assists clients in understanding key legal documents required for their businesses and their regulatory obligations.

Qualifications: Bachelor of Laws, Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice, Bachelor of Commerce, University of New South Wales.

Read all articles by Danielle

About LegalVision

LegalVision is an innovative commercial law firm that provides businesses with affordable, unlimited and ongoing legal assistance through our membership. We operate in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Learn more

We’re an award-winning law firm

  • Award

    2025 Future of Legal Services Innovation Finalist - Legal Innovation Awards

  • Award

    2025 Employer of Choice - Australasian Lawyer

  • Award

    2024 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2024 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Modern Law Private Client Awards

  • Award

    2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards