Reading time: 4 minutes

Injurious falsehood sounds like a complicated statement lawyers use to confuse people. In reality, it is a tort that a party can use where a statement made about an individual or company’s business causes actual damage to their reputation or commercial success. It’s kind of like defamation, but for businesses. Below, we will look at the difference between defamation and injurious falsehood, and the concepts used to establish injurious falsehood.

What is the Difference Between Defamation and Injurious Falsehood?

Defamation refers to a statement (either in writing or real life) that is published or made and is harmful to someone’s reputation. Injurious falsehood refers to statements that may actually cause reputational damage. In alleged cases of injurious falsehood, the focus is on the effect of the statement on the commercial interests of the company, rather than on any personal offence taken, which is considered in cases of defamation.

Many people consider defamation proceedings and injurious falsehood proceedings as going hand in hand. Unfortunately, this generalisation can backfire. In Mahon v Mach 1 Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 2), the Court considered a joint pleading of defamation and injurious falsehood and eventually struck out the entire pleading.

Elements of Injurious Falsehood

In Mahon, Justice McCallum reiterated the four key elements required to succeed in an action for injurious falsehood:

  • There must be a false statement of or concerning the plaintiff’s goods or business;
  • The defendant must have published that statement to a third person;
  • There must be malice on the part of the defendant; and
  • The plaintiff must provide that there has been actual damage as a direct result of the statement.

Failure to satisfy these elements will be fatal to a claim and consequently, obtaining a successful result for injurious falsehood is very difficult. We now turn our attention to examining these elements in more detail.


The statement made must have been made with malice. The ordinary definition of ‘malice’ is the ‘desire to harm someone’. What this means is you need to show that the person who made the statement about your goods or business intended to inflict damage on you or the business. Alternatively, it can sometimes be accepted that if the statement was made recklessly without any verification of the truth, it could still be held as an injurious statement. Much will depend on the facts of each case.

Has Actual Loss Been Suffered?

The plaintiff must show that they have suffered actual loss as a result of the statement. It would be helpful in proving this if you could show that people cancelled their current orders or stopped doing business with your company as a direct result of the statement. The Court, however, may consider less precise evidence. Again, it will depend on the individual circumstances of the case.

Key Takeaways

You should consider injurious falsehood when a false statement has been made and affects your business’s reputation (or your individual reputation but in a commercial context). As set out above, there are essential elements that must be met, without which your claim will not succeed.

Defamation and injurious falsehood are complex areas of law which warrant careful consideration of the particular facts and circumstances of each case. Unfortunately, it isn’t enough to simply show your feelings were hurt by someone’s statement, or to make sweeping statements about the loss suffered by your business without evidence. There are important elements that the Court needs to see before it will make a finding in your favour.


LegalVision’s dispute lawyers can provide you with advice on whether you have a claim of injurious falsehood, or if you have grounds to defend a claim of injurious falsehood. Questions? Get in touch on 1300 544 755.


Construction Contract Essentials

Thursday 12 August | 11:00 - 11:45am

Understand how construction contracts are drafted and how to protect your construction business.
Register Now

Startup 101: Understanding Cap Tables and ESOPs

Thursday 19 August | 11:00 - 11:45am

Cap tables and employee share option plans are essential for fast-growing startups. Learn more with this free webinar.
Register Now

Expanding to NZ: Structuring Your Business For Success

Thursday 26 August | 2:00 - 2:45pm

Launching a business in New Zealand? Understand how to structure your business for success with this free webinar.
Register Now

Preventing Modern Slavery: Your Business’ Legal Obligations

Thursday 9 September | 11:00 - 11:45am

Are you an Australian business with $100m+ annual consolidated revenue? Learn how to determine if you are a modern slavery reporting entity and your obligations under the legislation with this free webinar.
Register Now

About LegalVision: LegalVision is a tech-driven, full-service commercial law firm that uses technology to deliver a faster, better quality and more cost-effective client experience.

The majority of our clients are LVConnect members. By becoming a member, you can stay ahead of legal issues while staying on top of costs. From just $119 per week, get all your contracts sorted, trade marks registered and questions answered by experienced business lawyers.

Learn more about LVConnect

Need Legal Help? Get a Free Fixed-Fee Quote

If you would like to receive a free fixed-fee quote or get in touch with our team, fill out the form below.

  • 2020 Excellence in Technology & Innovation – Finalist – Australasian Law Awards 2020 Excellence in Technology & Innovation Finalist – Australasian Law Awards
  • 2020 Employer of Choice – Winner – Australasian Lawyer 2020 Employer of Choice Winner – Australasian Lawyer
  • 2021 Fastest Growing Law Firm - Financial Times APAC 500 2021 Fastest Growing Law Firm - Financial Times APAC 500
  • 2020 AFR Fast 100 List - Australian Financial Review 2020 AFR Fast 100 List - Australian Financial Review
  • 2021 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards 2021 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards
  • Most Innovative Law Firm - 2019 Australasian Lawyer 2019 Most Innovative Firm - Australasian Lawyer