Skip to content

Trade Mark Wars: No More Glee for 20th Century Fox

The UK Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s decision, ruling that US television show Glee infringes on the trade mark of a local comedy club, The Glee Club.

Comic Enterprises Ltd is a small company that owns a number of comedy clubs which they call The Glee Club. Comic Enterprises registered “The Glee Club” as a trade mark in 2001.

What was the US television show doing back then? Nothing, it didn’t exist yet. 20th Century Fox introduced and started airing ‘Glee’ on networks in 2009, eight years after The Glee Club’s trade mark registration.

When the television show began airing, Comic Enterprises became concerned that Glee was damaging their image and business, fearing that their customers were associating the television show with the comedy club.

The owner of The Glee Club, Mark Tughan, claimed that the television show did not attract the same type of audience as his customer base, and those who believed the two were connected were put off from attending the clubs. He argued that the similarity of the names and branding in the same field of entertainment services led to his business losing custom, and impeded their ability to establish a brand on the cutting edge of live comedy.

So Comic Enterprises took 20th Century Fox to court, claiming trade mark infringement.

Who would have thought a local small business up taking on a world renown film studio would emerge victorious? We look at what happened and the Court’s findings against 20th Century Fox.

The Court of Appeal Decision

In 2014, the High Court held that 20th Century Fox had indeed infringed The Glee Club’s trade mark with its show ‘Glee’.

The Court of Appeal upheld this decision and considered that the activities associated with each party were similar enough to make consumers think they were connected. The Court was of the opinion that it could be possible for the average consumer to associate that The Glee Club’s live comedy and music show with a television show.

Specifically, Lord Justice Kitchin of the Court of Appeal pointed out that the likelihood of confusion meant that 20th Century Fox had infringed the trade mark .

‘Catastrophic Consequences’

For 20th Century Fox, the decision requires a rebranding of the Glee franchise including DVD series, repeats on television, stage performances and merchandise.

Although the UK Court of Appeal has affirmed the High Court decision, the matter may still be referred to the European Court.

Continue reading this article below the form
Loading form

In Australia

The UK Court of Appeal’s reasoning is similar to what we could expect in Australia. Trade mark words can be infringed by the use of identical names or similar. This Glee Club case highlights that infringement can occur even where the marks are not used in relation to identical goods or services. Similar or associated services can cause confusion and constitute infringement.

Another lesson for Australian businesses to keep in mind is that the ability to protect a business name and branding comes with registered trade marks. Even a big business like 20th Century Fox couldn’t stand up against the small local Glee Club without a registered trade mark.

Questions about registering your trade mark? Let us know on 1300 544 755. 

Register for our free webinars

ACCC Merger Reforms: Key Takeaways for Executives and Legal Counsel

Online
Understand how the ACCC’s merger reforms impact your legal strategy. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Ask an Employment Lawyer: Contracts, Performance and Navigating Dismissals

Online
Ask an employment lawyer your contract, performance and dismissal questions in our free webinar. Register today.
Register Now

Stop Chasing Unpaid Invoices: Payment Terms That Actually Work

Online
Stop chasing late payments with stronger terms and protections. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Managing Psychosocial Risks: Employer and Legal Counsel Responsibilities

Online
Protect your business by managing workplace psychosocial risks. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now
See more webinars >
Dhanu Eliezer

Dhanu Eliezer

Growth Training Manager | View profile

Dhanu is a Growth Training Manager at LegalVision. Before joining LegalVision, Dhanu worked at Sydney Legal Practice, the Office of the Franchising Mediation Adviser and the Arts Law Centre. She has assisted hundreds of clients to protect and build their brand through trade mark registration and IP licensing. She is responsible for overseeing a smooth and effective network between clients, lawyers and project managers in the trade marks and intellectual property space.

Read all articles by Dhanu

About LegalVision

LegalVision is an innovative commercial law firm that provides businesses with affordable, unlimited and ongoing legal assistance through our membership. We operate in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Learn more

We’re an award-winning law firm

  • Award

    2025 Future of Legal Services Innovation Finalist - Legal Innovation Awards

  • Award

    2025 Employer of Choice - Australasian Lawyer

  • Award

    2024 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2024 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Modern Law Private Client Awards

  • Award

    2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards