Skip to content

Can I Use Call Recordings in my Legal Disputes?

Summary

  • In Australia, recording a conversation without consent may breach state or federal laws, with penalties varying by jurisdiction.
  • Businesses should establish clear policies on workplace recordings to manage legal risk and protect confidential information.
  • Unlawfully obtained recordings may be inadmissible as evidence and could expose the recording party to civil or criminal liability.
  • This article explains the legal framework around recording disputes for Australian business owners, covering key obligations and risks across jurisdictions.
  • It is produced by LegalVision, a commercial law firm that specialises in advising clients on workplace and dispute-related recording laws.

Tips for Businesses

Before recording any conversation, confirm whether all-party or one-party consent applies in your state. Document your internal recording policies clearly and train staff accordingly. If a dispute arises involving a recording, assess its lawfulness before relying on it as evidence.

Summarise with:
ChatGPT logo ChatGPT Perplexity logo Perplexity

On this page

Recording a conversation without consent is unlawful in most Australian states, and using such recordings as evidence in court is far from straightforward. Laws vary significantly across jurisdictions, and breaches can result in heavy fines or imprisonment. This article will show whether you can use call recordings in your legal dispute.

Recording a Phone Call

In NSW, recording a private conversation using a listening device is unlawful except for certain situations outlined under the Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW).

These exceptions include but are not limited to: 

  • recording in accordance with a warrant or emergency authorisation;
  • recording with the express or implied consent of the other party/parties to the conversation; or 
  • where recording the conversation is reasonably necessary for the protection of the lawful interests of that party.

The relevant legislation for each state and territory is as follows: 

  • Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW);
  • Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (Vic);
  • Invasion of Privacy Act 1971 (QLD);
  • Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NT);
  • Listening Devices Act 1992 (ACT);
  • Listening Devices Act 1991 (Tas); and
  • Surveillance Devices Act 1998 (WA).

In Victoria, South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania, and the Northern Territory, it is also illegal to record a private conversation through a listening device without the other party’s consent. However, in Queensland, it is legal to record a private conversation as long as you are a party to the conversation. A breach of these laws can carry heavy penalties, including hefty fines or even imprisonment. 

The definition of a listening device is wide and varies between states and territories. However, a mobile phone or dictation device generally falls under each definition. Similar rules apply to optical devices, encompassing videos taken on phones or cameras. 

Front page of publication
Guide to Protecting Your Brand

Your business’ brand represents your values, identity and reputation. Learn how to create a successful brand and protect it.

Download Now

Businesses Using Recordings for Dispute Resolution


Often, businesses will record phone calls with their clients or customers for quality assurance, training, and complaint/dispute investigation purposes. Some businesses, such as airlines or medical centres, may wish to examine recordings of calls in an attempt to resolve a dispute or investigate a customer complaint. The same legislation as above will govern whether a business can record a phone call. Ultimately, a business will need the consent of the other party on the line to do so. 

If you run a business and would like to record your calls, you must have some sort of a disclaimer at the beginning of the call. The disclaimer should include the full scope of the intended purposes and uses of the recording, including for dispute resolution, and should then ask for the caller’s consent. If an individual states that they do not want the call recorded, it is illegal to record it in all states other than Queensland. 

Whether a business can store, share or communicate material from recordings for dispute resolution or complaint investigations also varies slightly across states and territories. However, it will be contingent on seeking the caller’s consent for the intended purpose at the beginning of the call. 

Key Statistics:

  • 1 in 3: Australian employees admitted to covertly recording workplace conversations or disputes in 2024-25, raising significant privacy and evidence risks.
  • 55 per cent: of recorded conversations in disputes were ruled admissible by courts or the Fair Work Commission despite lacking consent.
  • 72 per cent: of businesses lack clear policies on recording meetings, increasing exposure to surveillance law breaches.

Sources:

  1. Fair Work Ombudsman (2026)
  2. University of Melbourne Law School (2024)
  3. Australian Institute of Company Directors (2025)
Continue reading this article below the form
Need legal advice?
Call 1300 544 755 for urgent assistance.
Otherwise, complete this form, and we will contact you within one business day.

Using Recordings in Court

The admissibility of recordings as evidence in court is complicated and is governed by section 138 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) in most jurisdictions, which states that evidence obtained illegally or improperly should not be admitted in a courtroom. However, the exception to this rule is if the desirability of admitting the evidence outweighs the undesirability of admitting evidence obtained illegally or improperly.

The courts will consider several factors when weighing the desirability of admitting such evidence. These include: 

  • the importance of the evidence;
  • the probative value, or strength, of the evidence;
  • the nature and seriousness of the offence to which the evidence relates; and 
  • the gravity of the impropriety or unlawful conduct used to obtain the evidence.

The party trying to admit illegally or improperly obtained evidence must seek permission to have it entered as evidence in Court.

If the Court allows for the recording to be admitted, it can be used as evidence regardless of if the other party to the conversation did not consent to the recording. Often, such recordings are permitted if they can prove extenuating circumstances. However, the Court will choose to exclude such recordings if the danger of it being unfairly prejudicial to a party outweighs the probative value of it being admitted as evidence.

Key Takeaways

There is no black and white answer regarding whether recordings can be used as evidence in a dispute. There are varying circumstances that must be looked at on a case by case level. It is important to remember that in most states, recording a conversation or interaction with a listening or optical device is illegal without the consent of the party/parties involved. Such an offence can result in fines or imprisonment in most states and territories. 

A Court may allow for illegally or improperly obtained recordings to be admitted as evidence under certain circumstances. You should seek legal advice if you plan to record a conversation in anticipation of a dispute or legal proceeding.

LegalVision provides ongoing legal support for businesses through our fixed-fee legal membership. Our experienced litigation lawyers help businesses manage contracts, employment law, disputes, intellectual property, and more, with unlimited access to specialist lawyers for a fixed monthly fee. To learn more about LegalVision’s legal membership, call 1300 544 755 or visit our membership page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it legal to record a private phone call in Australia?

In NSW, recording a private conversation using a listening device is unlawful except for certain situations outlined under the Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW).

What penalties apply for illegal recordings?

Breaching surveillance laws can result in hefty fines or imprisonment, varying by state.

Does court always exclude illegal recordings?

No. Courts may admit illegally obtained recordings if their probative value outweighs the undesirability of admission.

Must businesses disclose call recording purposes upfront?

Yes. Businesses must provide a disclaimer stating all intended uses, including dispute resolution, and obtain the caller’s consent before recording.

Register for our free webinars

AI in the Workplace: New Employer Obligations and Risk Exposure

Online
Learn how to meet your AI-related workplace obligations and manage legal risks as an employer. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Managing Rising Costs: Safely Exiting Contracts, Reducing Headcount and Leasing Options

Online
Know your legal options before making costly decisions about contracts, staff and leases. Register now.
Register Now

Protecting Your Brand: From Idea to Commercialisation with IP Australia

Online
Learn how to protect your brand with a trade mark and stop competitors from copying what you've built. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

EOFY Is Coming: The Costly Legal and Tax Mistakes Businesses Make

Online
Avoid EOFY pitfalls and get your business ready for success. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now
See more webinars >

Emma Sheen

Senior Lawyer | View profile

Emma is a Senior Lawyer in LegalVision’s Disputes and Litigation team. Prior to joining LegalVision, Emma gained extensive experience in handling intricate commercial disputes, including litigating large complex matters involving shareholder conflicts, intellectual property disputes, contractual disputes, building and construction matters, employment disputes and issues arising under the Australian Consumer Law.

Qualifications: Bachelor of Laws (Hons), Bachelor of Commerce, Diploma of Legal Practice, University of Newcastle. 

Read all articles by Emma

About LegalVision

LegalVision is an innovative commercial law firm that provides businesses with affordable, unlimited and ongoing legal assistance through our membership. We operate in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Learn more

LegalVision is an award-winning business law firm

  • Award

    2025 Future of Legal Services Innovation Finalist - Legal Innovation Awards

  • Award

    2025 Employer of Choice - Australasian Lawyer

  • Award

    2024 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2024 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Modern Law Private Client Awards

  • Award

    2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards