Social media has enabled free access to celebrity photos, images, and videos for every person. But, free access does not necessarily mean free use. There are rules around using someone else’s image, especially a celebrity. We set out the legal risks for brands using another person’s image in their marketing campaigns or product designs.

Inspiration vs. Duplication

If you launch a new clothing line featuring Ellen Degeneres or Kendall Jenner but are not defaming the women or claiming to be selling the clothes on their behalf, does this mean it’s ok? Not necessarily. Using an image of a celebrity or a well-known personality without obtaining a licence may open yourself up to a world of legal consequences. If you are creating your own images and using a celebrity’s photo as inspiration (e.g. a caricature of Morgan Freeman), then you may be in the clear.

Legal Risks

In Australia, there is no ‘right to publicity’ or ‘image right’ that allows a celebrity to control the use of their image. However, they can rely on the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) and the common law ‘tort’ of passing off if a business misuses their image (a ‘tort’ is a legal wrong). So, whether you are duplicating a celebrity’s image or using it for inspiration, you should consider the following to minimise your legal risk.

Passing Off

Passing off is a common law action used where there has been a misrepresentation that goods or services are associated with another.

A plaintiff must establish the following elements to succeed in an action for passing off:

  • they have a sufficient reputation or goodwill;
  • a misrepresentation was made that they were associated with or endorsed another’s goods or services; and
  • this misrepresentation causes or is likely to cause damage to their image.

If your new clothing line is likely to persuade your customers that your brand has some connection with that celebrity, then the celebrity can bring an action of passing off.

Misleading or Deceptive Conduct

Similarly to the common law tort of passing off, the ACL specifically prohibits engaging in conduct that could mislead or deceive consumers.

Section Number  Description
Section 18 A person must not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive
Section 29(1)(g)  A person must not…make a false or misleading representation that goods or services have sponsorship, approval, performance characteristics, accessories, uses or benefits.

 

This law protects every business, brand and person — not just celebrities. However, when the image used is of a well-known person or brand, there is a higher risk of misleading the public to believe that there is an association or endorsement.

Run This Town: Rihanna Takes on Topshop

In 2012, Topshop brought out a t-shirt bearing the image of Rihanna.

Although Topshop had obtained a licence from the owner of the photograph used, they had not obtained permission from Rihanna. Rihanna brought proceedings against Topshop, claiming that their conduct amounted to passing off. The judge found in favour of Rihanna, which was then upheld on appeal. In particular, the following facts resulted in the decision:

  • Rihanna had goodwill and a reputation in her image.
  • Although using an image of a well-known person does not necessarily result in a misrepresentation, in this case, Topshop made an effort to establish an association. Topshop ran competitions, made statements about Rihanna’s visit to their store and tweeted on social media about the pop star. As a result, the judge decided that Topshop’s conduct was likely to mislead consumers that they had an association with or endorsement by Rihanna.
  • The damage caused included a lost financial opportunity for licensing the right to use her image and potential loss of sales for her own merchandising.

Key Takeaways

Whether you are using photographs of celebrities from the internet or using them to inspire your own creations, you may be opening yourself up to claims under the ACL or the common law tort of passing off. 

A celebrity must prove that the use of their image could lead consumers to believe that there is a relationship in place to succeed in their claim. It’s not enough to simply say that a brand has used their image without permission.

If you are considering using a celebrity image as part of your marketing or product design, get in touch with LegalVision’s intellectual property specialists on 1300 544 755. 

About LegalVision: LegalVision is a tech-driven, full-service commercial law firm that uses technology to deliver a faster, better quality and more cost-effective client experience.
Alexandra Shaw

Get a Free Quote Now

If you would like to receive a free fixed-fee quote or get in touch with our team, fill out the form below.

  • We will be in touch shortly with a quote. By submitting this form, you agree to receive emails from LegalVision and can unsubscribe at any time. See our full Privacy Policy.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Privacy Policy Snapshot

We collect and store information about you. Let us explain why we do this.

What information do you collect?

We collect a range of data about you, including your contact details, legal issues and data on how you use our website.

How do you collect information?

We collect information over the phone, by email and through our website.

What do you do with this information?

We store and use your information to deliver you better legal services. This mostly involves communicating with you, marketing to you and occasionally sharing your information with our partners.

How do I contact you?

You can always see what data you’ve stored with us.

Questions, comments or complaints? Reach out on 1300 544 755 or email us at info@legalvision.com.au

View Privacy Policy