At LegalVision, our team of family lawyers are very experienced in drafting Binding Financial Agreements (BFAs). We often get asked by both our clients and their financial consultants why the firm requires such a detailed record of the assets and liabilities of both parties. Without full disclosure between parties to a BFA, the agreement may not be legally binding.

The importance of full disclosure

In a recent case, the Judge decided that a husband had not sufficiently disclosed his own finances, and, as a result, the BFA was set aside. This case highlights the importance of providing a true and honest account of your financial positions to ensure the BFA continues to be binding on both parties.

The Judge decided that within the standard recitals of the BFA was an implied term that required both parties to provide the other with a full and complete disclosure of each other’s finances, including their debts and liabilities. As all details were intended to be included, and clearly some were omitted, the normally binding nature of the BFA became null and void.

In most cases, when a family lawyer is asked to draft a BFA, there are three separate Schedules attached to the BFA; one documenting the husband’s combined assets and liabilities, one for the wife’s assets and liabilities, and finally, one detailing any assets jointly held by both husband and wife. These assets usually have approved values attached to them. In this case, however, there was no valuation of any of the assets, making it difficult for the Judge not to set aside the BFA in its substantially incomplete form.

It should come as no surprise that the Judge set the BFA aside, as the husband succeeded in omitting certain assets and financial details regarding those assets. This amounted to not disclosing “a material matter”, which the Judge saw as sufficient misconduct to warrant voiding the BFA entirely. This is because the wife would not have entered the BFA but for the misrepresentations made by her husband regarding the status of his assets/finances.

Despite best practice, the Court made the point that valuation of assets was not essential to upholding the binding nature of the BFA. The Court concluded that spouses could ordinarily make their own enquiries into the values of assets (or detriment of liabilities) listed in a BFA and that it was not necessary that these values be included.

In other words, as long as all assets are identifiable and can be shown to exist, it doesn’t matter that the values are not individually attached to each asset.

Had the husband not withheld significant details about his true financial position, the BFA may not have been set aside. Unfortunately, however, he was not honest about his assets and liabilities and is now paying the price.

Conclusion

Instead of risking the personal assets you’ve accrued over time prior to entering a relationship, speak with a family lawyer about making the responsible choice and entering into a BFA with your partner.

Emma Jervis
If you would like further information on any of the topics mentioned in this article, please get in touch using the form on this page.
Would you like to get in touch with Emma about this topic, or ask us any other question? Please fill out the form below to send Emma a message!

Privacy Policy Snapshot

We collect and store information about you. Let us explain why we do this.

What information do you collect?

We collect a range of data about you, including your contact details, legal issues and data on how you use our website.

How do you collect information?

We collect information over the phone, by email and through our website.

What do you do with this information?

We store and use your information to deliver you better legal services. This mostly involves communicating with you, marketing to you and occasionally sharing your information with our partners.

How do I contact you?

You can always see what data you’ve stored with us.

Questions, comments or complaints? Reach out on 1300 544 755 or email us at info@legalvision.com.au

View Privacy Policy