Skip to content

WHS and OHS Regulatory Update: April 2026

Summary

  • Employers must ensure all workers complete WHS training, not just make it available, as gaps in training can result in significant fines and lengthy legal proceedings.
  • Duty of care extends beyond employees to customers, contractors and the public, requiring employers to identify hazards and implement controls for all workplace activities.
  • Psychosocial risks are an active enforcement priority across all industries, and employers must identify, assess and manage these risks alongside physical hazards.
  • This article explains key work health and safety obligations for Australian business owners, covering enforcement trends, recent case law, and legislative developments across multiple jurisdictions.
  • It is produced by LegalVision, a commercial law firm that specialises in advising clients on work health and safety compliance.

Tips for Businesses

Audit your WHS training records to confirm all workers have completed required training. Review your risk assessments to include psychosocial hazards. Establish clear site protocols for deliveries and public interactions. If operating in Victoria, begin developing a work-from-home policy ahead of proposed legislative changes.

Summarise with:
ChatGPT logo ChatGPT Perplexity logo Perplexity

On this page

Officers must continually ensure their organisations stay compliant and remain informed about work health and safety issues. This WHS update highlights recent changes to support officers in meeting their obligations and keeping up to date with WHS developments.

Legislative Updates

SafeWork NSW Reporting and Enforcement Trends

SafeWork NSW has published its first set of reporting outcomes since commencing as a standalone regulator on 1 July 2024, offering valuable insight into enforcement activity and areas of focus.

In October 2025, the regulator carried out its largest statewide compliance operation, conducting 570 unannounced inspections over three days. It issued 736 notices to 261 employers and 10 fines totalling $63,300, with around half of the notices relating to work at heights.

Between 1 July and 31 December 2025, SafeWork NSW completed 79 investigations into serious workplace incidents, including fatalities, significant injuries and dangerous occurrences.

During the same period, the regulator received 7,570 requests for service (RFS), showing strong worker and public engagement with workplace safety issues. Of these, 1,476 (19.5%) related to psychosocial risks, highlighting the regulator’s growing focus on psychological health.

Psychosocial related requests were most prevalent in the following industries: 

  • Health Care and Social Assistance sector (20%), followed by Education and Training (12%); 
  • Other Services (12%); 
  • Construction (8%); 
  • Retail Trade (8%); 
  • Public Administration and Safety (7%);
  • Transport, Postal and Warehousing (7%); 
  • Accommodation and Food Services (6%); and 
  • Manufacturing (5%), with all other industries accounting for 15%.

Psychosocial risks affect all industries, not just traditionally high-risk sectors, and require active management.

Employers must actively identify, assess and manage psychosocial risks. These risks can come from heavy workloads, poor change management, workplace conflict, remote work, or exposure to traumatic events.

Work From Home Reforms (Victoria)

The Victorian Government plans to introduce legislation giving eligible employees the right to work from home at least two days per week. The changes are expected to take effect from 1 September, subject to parliamentary approval.

The proposed reforms would amend the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic) and apply across all workplaces, regardless of size. However, small business employers would have until 1 July 2027 to comply, giving them extra time to update policies and operations.

These reforms are still at the proposal stage, but they may raise constitutional issues. A state-based right to work from home could overlap or conflict with federal workplace laws and industrial relations rules. It is also unclear whether state legislation can impose these obligations on employers. As a result, implementing these reforms may involve legal and jurisdictional challenges.

Despite these uncertainties, the proposed changes remain highly relevant for employers. Now is the time to develop clear work-from-home policies. Employers should also consider how remote work arrangements affect their duty to manage psychosocial risks.

Flexible working requests are already a protected right under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (‘Act’). Eligible employees can request flexible arrangements, and employers must consider these requests in line with the Act.

New Codes of Practice 

Safe Work Australia has introduced a new Model Code of Practice: Managing the risks of biological hazards at work. 

This Code provides clear guidance on how to identify and manage risks from biological hazards, including viruses, bacteria, parasites and fungi, across many industries. It applies to any workplace where people may face exposure to these hazards and is especially relevant for sectors such as healthcare, agriculture, manufacturing and waste management.

In addition, Safe Work Australia has released an online version of the Model Code of Practice for the Healthcare and Social Assistance industry. This digital format presents the same substantive guidance as the written Code but in a more accessible, user-friendly format, supporting employers and workers in navigating complex safety requirements in high risk environments.

National Initiatives: Mental Health and Psychological Safety 

The Western Australian Government has launched the Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Program Support Fund, investing $3.39 million over four years to support workplace mental health initiatives. The program focuses on practical, workplace-based measures that address both physical and psychological harm. This reflects a broader shift toward integrated health and safety strategies.

Regulators now expect employers to actively identify, assess and manage psychosocial risks, and to implement practical controls to protect workers. Enforcement in this area continues to increase, with psychosocial hazards remaining a key priority.

Similarly, WorkSafe Western Australia has released a new information sheet to guide workplaces preventing and managing suicide and suicidal behaviour in work-related contexts.

Continue reading this article below the form
Need legal advice?
Call 1300 544 755 for urgent assistance.
Otherwise, complete this form, and we will contact you within one business day.

Cases and Incidents

Case Study 1: $150,000 Fine After COVID-19 Training Failure

What Happened?

A residential aged care provider was convicted and fined $150,000 after workers contracted COVID-19 at a facility in July 2020. The Melbourne County Court sentenced the provider after it pleaded guilty to failing to properly train workers to carry out their work safely.

In March 2020, national guidance set out how to manage COVID-19 in aged care facilities. It covered recognising symptoms, understanding how the virus spreads, using PPE correctly, maintaining supplies, and ensuring staff were trained to respond to outbreaks.

Between March and June 2020, some employees attended five PPE training sessions delivered by external medical professionals. However, not all workers took part. As a result, the provider failed to ensure consistent training, leaving some employees without the knowledge and skills to use PPE properly or respond to COVID-19 risks.

What Was the Outcome?

The Court imposed a $150,000 fine on the provider for breaching its obligations to provide adequate training and instruction. While the penalty is significant, it sits at the lower end of the penalties available under relevant work health and safety laws.

The prosecution occurred about six years after the original incident in 2020. This highlights that WHS matters can involve long investigations and proceedings that extend well beyond the initial event. In addition to the fine, the organisation likely faced significant administrative burden, legal costs and ongoing advisory expenses. These combined costs can outweigh the penalty itself.

This case is a clear reminder that failing to meet WHS obligations can expose businesses to long-term regulatory scrutiny and significant costs.

Key Takeaways

Training must go beyond simply being available. Employers must deliver it properly, ensure all workers complete it, and confirm they understand it.

Businesses must also carry out regular risk assessments. This means identifying risks to workers and clients, putting appropriate controls in place (such as PPE protocols), and reviewing and updating those controls as circumstances change.

Case Study 2: $115,000 Fine After Woman Crushed by Water Tank

What Happened?

Two companies, Australian Water Systems Pty Ltd (AWS) and Clark Tanks Transport Pty Ltd (CTT), were fined a total of $115,000 after a woman was seriously injured during a delivery at her home in Victoria.

The incident occurred when the customer and his wife helped the delivery driver push a 475-kilogram water tank off the back of a truck. The tank became unstable and fell onto the woman, causing serious injuries, including a fractured femur, crushed pelvis and ribs, and a punctured lung. The driver, two neighbours and the woman’s husband then lifted the tank off her.

What Was the Outcome?

The Mildura Magistrates’ Court sentenced the companies after they pleaded guilty to breaches of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic). 

AWS was fined $50,000 without conviction for failing to ensure a workplace under its management was safe. CTT was fined $65,000 without conviction for failing to ensure people other than employees were not exposed to risks, for not notifying WorkSafe immediately after the incident, and for disturbing the incident site.

The Court found that both companies could have reasonably reduced or eliminated the risk by implementing exclusion zones during unloading and ensuring adherence to safe procedures.

Key Takeaways

Employers’ duties extend beyond employees. Customers, contractors, visitors and the public can all face risks during workplace activities, such as deliveries. Employers must identify these hazards early and put controls in place to eliminate or reduce risk. This includes setting clear exclusion zones, using barriers and signage, and restricting access to dangerous areas.

Employers must also report notifiable incidents to regulators. Under WHS laws, PCBUs must notify the relevant state, territory or Commonwealth regulator immediately after a serious incident.

Notifiable incidents include deaths, serious injuries or illnesses, and dangerous events that expose someone to serious risk, even if no one is harmed.

These obligations apply to employees, contractors and the public. Employers must preserve the incident site until an inspector attends or gives further instructions, while still helping injured people and making the area safe. LegalVision members can use the advice line for guidance on meeting these obligations and reducing legal risk.

Questions?

If you need legal assistance with a WHS matter or need help identifying an officer, book a consultation call on Prism. As a member, you can request unlimited legal advice consultations.

Register for our free webinars

Customer Complaints: Simple Rules to Reduce Refunds and Bad Reviews

Online
Learn simple rules to reduce refunds, handle complaints properly and avoid costly legal mistakes. Register now.
Register Now

In-House Counsel Series: Manage Disputes, Risk & Stakeholders Effectively

Online
As legal counsel, strengthen your approach to business conflict. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Avoiding Common Legal Pitfalls in Arts and Entertainment Businesses

Online
Reduce legal risk in your arts or recreation business. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Global Disruption And Rising Costs: What Your Contracts Should Cover

Online
Manage global disruption and rising costs with clearer contract terms. Register for our webinar today.
Register Now
See more webinars >
James_True

James True

Head of Enterprise - Legal | View profile

James is a Head of Enterprise – Legal at LegalVision. He advises across all areas of employment, including employment and independent contractor agreements, termination of employment (including redundancy and unlawful termination), employment disputes, investigations, modern awards, work health safety obligations and notifiable incidents. Prior to joining LegalVision, James spent almost 10 years working in private practice across employment and work health safety.

Qualifications: Bachelor of Laws, Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice, Macquarie University.

Read all articles by James

About LegalVision

LegalVision is an innovative commercial law firm that provides businesses with affordable, unlimited and ongoing legal assistance through our membership. We operate in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Learn more

LegalVision is an award-winning business law firm

  • Award

    2025 Future of Legal Services Innovation Finalist - Legal Innovation Awards

  • Award

    2025 Employer of Choice - Australasian Lawyer

  • Award

    2024 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2024 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Modern Law Private Client Awards

  • Award

    2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards