Like all those occupying positions of trust, company directors cannot improperly use their position of power. However, it can be confusing when considering what actually constitutes a director’s misuse of office. This article explains the proper purpose obligation that is imposed upon directors and sets out the penalties for breaching these obligations.

What is the Proper Purpose Duty?

Directors are required to exercise their powers for a proper purpose. A purpose is proper if it is motivated by the desire to benefit the company. All actions founded on it, therefore, become a permissible and appropriate use of directorial powers.

The proper purpose duty originates from fiduciary duties. These are the duties of individuals to act in the best interests of someone who has placed their trust in them.

For example, a doctor has a fiduciary duty to provide the best care they reasonably can for a patient.

However, public policy makers considered the proper purpose duty to be so important that it became included in the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act). Furthermore, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is responsible for enforcing it.

The substance of the proper purpose duty in each source of law is substantially the same. However, the penalties for breaching the duty differ depending on whether a party breach either their fiduciary duties or breached the Act.

Directors' Duties Complete Guide

If you are a company director, complying with directors’ duties are core to adhering to corporate governance laws.
This guide will help you understand the directors’ duties that apply to you within the Australian corporate law framework.

Download Now

Proper Purpose Rule

The proper purpose rule states that if a director uses their power for reasons other than the benefit of the company, it is improper. The director has failed in fulfilling their fiduciary duties to the organisation. That is, their obligation to act in good faith and for the benefit of it.

Most commonly, improper actions by directors involve those motivated by the desire to secure a private gain or advantage. However, this is not the only way that a director can inappropriately use their office. Without the founding principle of the benefit of the company, any action could be improper. If a court needs to determine if a director has breached the duty, it uses a two-tiered process:

1. Ultimate Purpose

First, the court establishes the ultimate purpose of the power used. It questions why the power exists in the first place. In identifying the parameters of the power, the court defines any inappropriate reasons to employ that power.

2. Motivation

The court then determines if the purpose that motivated the director in question lies within the range of appropriate objects for that power.

A director or board of directors can use their powers for several different purposes. In these cases, a court examines all motivations and determines what mainly inspired the use of the power in question. The court questions whether if it were not but for having an improper motivation, would the director still have exercised their power? if not, the director has breached their duty.

Consequences of Breach

The consequences for misuse of office differ depending on whether a party takes action under the fiduciary duties or the Act. Under the fiduciary duties, the only party who can bring an action against a director is the company. If they are successful, a court can order:

  1. equitable compensation: which puts the company in the position it would have been without breach and its resulting loss;
  2. rescission of contract: if a director has an interest in a contract to which the company is a party, the company can rescind the contract;
  3. account of profits: a director must account for any profits made from their breach;
  4. constructive trust: a court creates a trust whereby the director holds any assets derived from their breach, in trust for the company; or
  5.  injunction: the court orders a director to cease an action.

In contrast, ASIC brings actions under the Act. Potential penalties include:

  1.  pecuniary penalty: a director must pay a sum to ASIC on the  Commonwealth’s behalf;
  2.  compensation; or
  3.  disqualification.

Key Takeaways

If a director has breached their duties, they could face a number of consequences. The main duty that a director must uphold is that their actions are done with a proper purpose. If they have breached this proper purpose, claims can be brought under either the Act or under fiduciary duties. If you have any questions about whether a director has breached their duties, contact LegalVision’s litigation lawyers on 1300 544 755 or fill out the form on this page.

About LegalVision: LegalVision is a tech-driven, full-service commercial law firm that uses technology to deliver a faster, better quality and more cost-effective client experience.
Carole Hemingway

Get a Free Quote Now

If you would like to receive a free fixed-fee quote or get in touch with our team, fill out the form below.

  • We will be in touch shortly with a quote. By submitting this form, you agree to receive emails from LegalVision and can unsubscribe at any time. See our full Privacy Policy.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Privacy Policy Snapshot

We collect and store information about you. Let us explain why we do this.

What information do you collect?

We collect a range of data about you, including your contact details, legal issues and data on how you use our website.

How do you collect information?

We collect information over the phone, by email and through our website.

What do you do with this information?

We store and use your information to deliver you better legal services. This mostly involves communicating with you, marketing to you and occasionally sharing your information with our partners.

How do I contact you?

You can always see what data you’ve stored with us.

Questions, comments or complaints? Reach out on 1300 544 755 or email us at

View Privacy Policy