Skip to content

What is a Calderbank Offer?

Summary

  • A Calderbank offer is a written settlement proposal made “without prejudice save as to costs”, allowing courts to consider it when deciding legal costs after a dispute.

  • It encourages early resolution and can shift cost liability if a reasonable offer is rejected and the final judgment is less favourable.

  • To be effective, it must be clear, reasonable, and open for acceptance for a defined period.

  • This guide explains Calderbank offers for business owners in Australia, outlining how they work and when to use them, prepared by LegalVision, a commercial law firm that specialises in advising clients on commercial disputes.

  • It provides a practical explanation of risks, cost implications and key considerations when making or responding to such offers.

Tips for Businesses

Use Calderbank offers to encourage settlement and manage costs. Ensure offers are clear, reasonable and time-bound. Assess your prospects, claim value and the other party’s ability to pay before accepting or rejecting. Document all offers carefully and seek legal advice before responding.

Summarise with:
ChatGPT logo ChatGPT Perplexity logo Perplexity

On this page

A Calderbank offer is a formal settlement proposal made during a dispute that can later influence who pays legal costs if the matter proceeds to court. It encourages parties to resolve disputes early by attaching cost consequences to unreasonable refusals. This article explains what a Calderbank offer is and what you should consider if you have received an offer.

What is a Calderbank Offer?

A Calderbank offer, also known as a Calderbank letter or Calderbank proposal, is an offer of settlement made by one party to another to resolve a legal dispute. It encourages parties to negotiate instead of going to trial. It must be a genuine compromise open for a reasonable period. An essential feature of a Calderbank offer is that it is made ‘without prejudice save as to costs’. 

What Does “Save as to Costs” Mean?

The phrase “save as to costs” is a key element of a Calderbank offer. It means that while the offer cannot be presented as evidence in court during the trial or hearing, the court may be informed of it after the proceedings have concluded, specifically when determining which party must pay indemnity costs and the amount of those costs. 

What Are Indemnity Costs?

An indemnity cost refers to the reasonable legal costs that you incur throughout the court proceedings, including:

  • fees;
  • charges;
  • expenses; and
  • remuneration.

This means that Calderbank offers play a role in informing the judge’s decision when it is a question of costs. While legal costs are generally paid by the losing party in a court case, this burden can be reversed in the event of a rejected settlement offer.

For example, suppose your employee sues you for wrongful termination. You can offer them a reasonable out-of-court settlement, which they subsequently refuse. If they win the case in court and are awarded a similar remedy, you can raise the original offer as evidence that the former employee should bear the burden of paying their own and your legal costs. This is because they have unnecessarily extended the legal proceedings by refusing to accept your reasonable offer.

Continue reading this article below the form
Need legal advice?
Call 1300 544 755 for urgent assistance.
Otherwise, complete this form, and we will contact you within one business day.

Why is it Called a Calderbank Offer?

The terminology of a ‘Calderbank offer’ comes from the landmark case of Calderbank v Calderbank. This important decision established the idea that when a successful party in a case refuses to accept an earlier settlement offer from the unsuccessful party, this rejection of the offer can be used as evidence when deciding who is responsible for financing the case’s legal costs.

For this to be the case, the terms of the offer outlined in the Calderbank letter must be reasonable and comparable to the sum awarded by the court.

What is Included in a Calderbank Offer?

The specific contents of a Calderbank offer will likely vary depending on the particular nature of the dispute and the parties involved. 

A Calderbank offer typically includes specific terms and proposals for settlement made by one party to the other during the course of litigation. This may include a specific monetary amount to be paid by one party to the other, a list of actions to be taken, or any other conditions that would resolve the dispute.

The Calderbank offer should also specify the timeframe within which the party receiving the offer can respond. By having a time limit, the parties are encouraged to consider the settlement proposal promptly.

Considering the Calderbank Offer

You should reasonably consider all Calderbank offers you receive. When considering the offer, there are three important considerations to remember.

1. Prospects of Success at a Final Hearing

Whether or not you should accept a Calderbank offer will largely depend on what result you will likely receive if the dispute proceeds to court. Your lawyer can provide legal advice on your prospects of success at a final hearing. They can also help you decide whether to accept the offer or draft a reasonable counteroffer.

2. The Value of Your Case

Make sure you are realistic about the value of your claim and modest in your estimates. Consider how your claim value compares to the costs you will incur to carry the case forward, such as the cost of legal representation and the time you will have to spend attending court. Balance these considerations against the Calderbank offer you have received. Remember that it can often be 9-12 months before you find yourself at a hearing.

3. The Cost of ‘Winning’

Unfortunately, parties may find that despite succeeding in their case, the opposing party does not have the funds to pay. This is not exactly a favourable result. Consider whether the other party can pay if you ‘win’ or whether preparing for the hearing may chew up their funds.

Key Statistics:

  1. Over 70%: Of commercial disputes in Australia are resolved through negotiation or alternative dispute resolution methods, underscoring the effectiveness of strategies like Calderbank offers.
  2. 50%: Of parties who make Calderbank offers and enter settlement discussions report resolution of the dispute before going to trial, highlighting the success of using such offers to avoid litigation.
  3. $3.7 million: The estimated savings for Australian businesses annually from using alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods like Calderbank offers instead of proceeding with litigation.

Sources:

    1. Civil Justice Council, The Effectiveness of Alternative Dispute Resolution, 2023.
    2. Federal Court of Australia, Annual Report, 2022.
    3. Australian Government, Productivity Commission, Inquiry Report on Access to Justice, 2023.

Not Accepting the Calderbank Offer

Each party should seriously and genuinely consider any offer of settlement they receive. If a court feels your rejection is unreasonable, they may order you to pay the other party’s court costs. When determining whether rejection of a Calderbank offer was unreasonable, the courts may consider, amongst other factors:

  • the timing of when the offer was made (early or late in the proceedings);
  • how long the offer was open;
  • whether the offer is a reasonable compromise;
  • the prospects of success for the offeree; and
  • if the terms were expressed clearly and precisely.

Note that you do not have to accept a Calderbank offer. For instance, if the other party does not give you sufficient time to consider the offer, or it is too early to determine the full extent of each party’s position, acceptance may not be the right course of action. If you do not wish to accept the offer, consider making a reasonable counteroffer.

Front page of publication
Directors' Duties Complete Guide

If you are a company director, complying with directors’ duties are core to adhering to corporate governance laws.
This guide will help you understand the directors’ duties that apply to you within the Australian corporate law framework.

Download Now

Key Takeaways

A Calderbank offer can be a powerful tool in settlement negotiations. It can encourage parties to negotiate candidly and make a genuine effort to reach a compromise without incurring the expenses associated with litigation. Parties must reasonably consider all Calderbank offers or risk an unfavourable costs order even if they do ‘win’.

LegalVision provides ongoing legal support for businesses through our fixed-fee legal membership. Our experienced litigation lawyers help businesses manage contracts, employment law, disputes, intellectual property, and more, with unlimited access to specialist lawyers for a fixed monthly fee. To learn more about LegalVision’s legal membership, call 1300 544 755 or visit our membership page.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Calderbank offer?

It is an offer of settlement made by one party to another to resolve the dispute. The offer must be a genuine compromise open for a reasonable amount of time. Additionally, the offer is made ‘without prejudice save as to costs’.

What are indemnity costs?

This refers to the reasonable legal costs you incur throughout the court proceedings, including fees, charges, expenses and remuneration.

Why is it called a Calderbank offer?

The term ‘Calderbank offer’ comes from the landmark case of Calderbank v Calderbank.


Can you withdraw or revise a Calderbank offer?

Yes, you can withdraw or revise a Calderbank offer at any time before acceptance. However, you should clearly communicate any changes in writing to avoid confusion and ensure the offer remains legally effective.

Register for our free webinars

Charge Your Growth in 2026: Franchising, Licensing and Expansion Case Studies

Online
Learn how to expand through franchising or licensing, structure your network, and protect your brand as you grow. Register now.
Register Now

Protecting Your Brand: Stop Competitors and Copycats Cashing In

Online
Learn how to protect your brand from competitors and copycats and take action against infringement. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

HR in Hospitality: Avoid the Legal Traps for Growing Businesses

Online
Learn how to avoid common HR legal traps in hospitality and manage your team compliantly. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Customer Complaints: Simple Rules to Reduce Refunds and Bad Reviews

Online
Learn simple rules to reduce refunds, handle complaints properly and avoid costly legal mistakes. Register now.
Register Now
See more webinars >

Jodie Thomson

Practice Leader | View profile

Jodie is a Practice Leader in LegalVision’s Disputes and Litigation team. She has more than eight years of experience in commercial litigation, helping clients solve legal problems, ranging from contractual disputes to recovering debts, bankruptcy and corporate insolvency, and disputes involving employment issues, commercial leasing and franchising. Jodie also has experience appearing in the NSW Local, District and Supreme Courts and the Federal Court of Australia.

Qualifications: Bachelor of Laws, Bachelor of Arts, University of New England

Read all articles by Jodie

About LegalVision

LegalVision is an innovative commercial law firm that provides businesses with affordable, unlimited and ongoing legal assistance through our membership. We operate in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Learn more

LegalVision is an award-winning business law firm

  • Award

    2025 Future of Legal Services Innovation Finalist - Legal Innovation Awards

  • Award

    2025 Employer of Choice - Australasian Lawyer

  • Award

    2024 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2024 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Modern Law Private Client Awards

  • Award

    2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards