Airbnb is still figuring out its legal position as the latest Airbnb matter heard in the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) ruled that a landlord could not evict her tenants for listing the apartment on Airbnb.

Landlord Catherine Swan noticed that her apartment had been listed on the website by tenants Barbara Uecker and Michael Greaves without her permission. Swan served the pair a notice in January asking them to vacate for breaching their tenancy agreement by renting out their second bedroom without her consent. Swan applied to VCAT for a possession order in early February. In March, the matter was heard in front of tribunal member Kylea Campana who decided that Swan could not evict Uecker and Greaves.

Licence or Sub-Lease

The matter hinged upon whether renting the room through Airbnb was considered a licence or a sub-lease. Uecker and Greaves relied on the Airbnb terms which state that “this is an occupancy agreement as a license to occupy premises”, with the guest described as a ‘licensee’. In order for Swan to be successful in her claim, she needed to show that the Airbnb arrangement was a sub-lease, which under s 81 of the Residential Tenancies Act (RTA) is not permitted without the landlord’s written consent.

Why Was it Considered a Licence?

In addition to considering the express terms of the Airbnb agreement which described the arrangement as a licence, Campana also considered the definitions of ‘licence’ and ‘sub-lease’ and the nature of the arrangement between the tenants and their Airbnb guests.

Definitions of ‘Licence’ and ‘Sub-Lease’

Where the person is given a right to occupy the bedroom, while sharing other parts of the residence with others, there is a presumption that it is a licence. In this type of arrangement, the licensor (i.e. tenant) retains control over the premises and the licensee is not given the exclusive right to use the place. This presumption is strengthened when the licensor (i.e tenant) is also occupying the premises.

In contrast to this, a sub-lease would mean that the sub-tenant has exclusive possession of the premises (either part or whole), with the right to exclude all others including the head-tenant.

It is important to note that if the question is addressed in court, courts will focus on the nature of the relationship and the intention of the parties rather than the terminology used. So in this situation, the fact that the Airbnb agreement used the word ‘licence’ did not alone determine the licence arrangement.

Airbnb Guests

To work out whether Airbnb guests had been granted exclusive possession such as to constitute a sub-lease, Campana looked at the details of their stay. Guests were given one bedroom to occupy and shared the other facilities in the apartment. Airbnb guests stayed short-term, and were under the terms of the Airbnb agreement including the departure and arrival times, payment platform, and their use of the premises. Tenants Uecker and Greaves retained access to the apartment before, during and after the guests’ stay and they also had the ability to ask a guest to leave if they overstayed.

In light of all of this, Campana found that there was no sub-lease and that the legal relationship between the tenants and the Airbnb guests was a licence to occupy. It was therefore not a breach of the RTA and Swan’s Notice to Vacate to her tenants was considered invalid.

What Does This Mean for Landlords?

The VCAT decision means that landlords should be careful about trying to evict tenants who list their properties on Airbnb, on the basis that they do not have permission to sub-lease. As the matter currently stands, you cannot rely on the provisions in the RTA which prohibit subletting without consent.

If landlords discover that their tenant is renting the premises to Airbnb guests without their consent and the landlord wishes to end their tenancy, they will need to rely on other provisions in the tenancy agreement or the RTA to terminate the lease.

Another option for landlords is to include a special condition in the tenancy agreement which explicitly prohibits posting the premises on Airbnb and outlining the consequences of breaching the condition.

Alternatively, if a landlord is happy for the premises to be placed on Airbnb by their tenant, they should make sure that the necessary council approval or insurance measures are in place.

Good News for Tenants

The VCAT decision has been considered good news for tenants wanting to earn some extra cash through Airbnb. Tenants are able to let others stay on the premises short-term and charge a fee, as long as it is not a sub-lease.

Despite this decision, tenants should still tread carefully in participating in Airbnb through their rental property. Airbnb is still a new concept in the legal space and the waters are still untested. Not only that but even if Airbnb-ing the premises is permitted from a licence/sub-lease perspective, it does not necessarily mean that all relevant areas of law are satisfied. Tenants should be aware of other legal considerations and requirements under the legislation and their tenancy agreement to avoid risk of eviction.

***

Swan is now appealing this decision in the Supreme Court. The VCAT decision described by many as a landmark may be overturned and bring good news for landlords and disappointment for tenants. But watch this space – we will keep you updated as the matter progresses. 

What do you think? Tag us on Twitter @legalvision_au and let us know or get in touch with our startup lawyers on 1300 544 755.

COVID-19 Business Survey
LegalVision is conducting a survey on the impact of COVID-19 for businesses across Australia. The survey takes 2 minutes to complete and all responses are anonymous. We would appreciate your input. Take the survey now.

About LegalVision: LegalVision is a tech-driven, full-service commercial law firm that uses technology to deliver a faster, better quality and more cost-effective client experience.

The majority of our clients are LVConnect members. By becoming a member, you can stay ahead of legal issues while staying on top of costs. For just $199 per month, membership unlocks unlimited lawyer consultations, faster turnaround times, free legal templates and members-only discounts.

Learn more about LVConnect

Dhanu Eliezer
Need Legal Help? Get a Free Fixed-Fee Quote

If you would like to receive a free fixed-fee quote or get in touch with our team, fill out the form below.

  • By submitting this form, you agree to receive emails from LegalVision and can unsubscribe at any time. See our full Privacy Policy.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Our Awards
  • 2019 Top 25 Startups - LinkedIn 2019 Top 25 Startups - LinkedIn
  • 2019 NewLaw Firm of the Year - Australian Law Awards 2019 NewLaw Firm of the Year - Australian Law Awards
  • 2020 Fastest Growing Law Firm - Financial Times APAC 500 2020 Fastest Growing Law Firm - Financial Times APAC 500
  • 2020 AFR Fast 100 List - Australian Financial Review 2020 AFR Fast 100 List - Australian Financial Review
  • 2020 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Australasian Law Awards 2020 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Australasian Law Awards
  • Most Innovative Law Firm - 2019 Australasian Lawyer 2019 Most Innovative Firm - Australasian Lawyer
Privacy Policy Snapshot

We collect and store information about you. Let us explain why we do this.

What information do you collect?

We collect a range of data about you, including your contact details, legal issues and data on how you use our website.

How do you collect information?

We collect information over the phone, by email and through our website.

What do you do with this information?

We store and use your information to deliver you better legal services. This mostly involves communicating with you, marketing to you and occasionally sharing your information with our partners.

How do I contact you?

You can always see what data you’ve stored with us.

Questions, comments or complaints? Reach out on 1300 544 755 or email us at info@legalvision.com.au

View Privacy Policy