Skip to content

Unfair Terms in Small Business Contracts

As a small business, you should know that the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) protects you from unfair contract terms. Small businesses often face a disparity in bargaining power, which might ordinarily allow larger businesses to include clauses that unfairly disadvantage and work against small businesses. However, the unfair contract terms (UCT) regime addresses this imbalance. This article will give an overview of the unfair contract terms regime by: 

  • explaining standard form contracts;
  • providing examples of what constitutes unfair contract terms; and
  • addressing the upcoming changes to the UCT regime (which will widen the gambit of the regime). 
Front page of publication
Buying a Business: Guide to Negotiating Terms

Know which key terms to negotiate when buying a business to protect your interests and gain a favourable outcome.

Download Now

What is the Unfair Contract Terms Regime? 

From 9 November 2023, there will be significant changes to the unfair contracts regime, expanding the criteria defining a small business and increasing the penalties for breaches of the unfair contract terms regime. The law applies to ‘standard form contracts’ entered where:

  • the contract is for the supply of goods or services or the sale of an interest in land; and
  • at least one of the parties is a small business. This means the business employs less than 100 people or has an annual turnover of less than $10 million.

The contract value threshold under ACL, which previously determined the applicability of the UCT regime, will no longer apply. Under the ASIC Act, the protections for small businesses will apply if the upfront price payable is less than $5,000,000, and the other party meets the small business definition.  

Previously, if a court or tribunal considered a clause as an ‘unfair contract term’, the relevant term would become void and unenforceable, and the remainder of the contract would continue to operate. However, under the expanded UCT regime, UCTs are illegal and attract significant penalties.

Standard Form Contracts

A standard form contract is a contract between two parties where one party cannot negotiate the terms. Importantly, from November 2023, a standard form contract will be presumed to be standard form unless proven otherwise. Generally, a standard form contract refers to a pre-written contract where: 

  • one party possesses the bargaining power;
  • one party prepares the contract without discussion between the parties;
  • the other party must accept or reject terms on a ‘take it or leave it basis’; or
  • the other party does not have an effective opportunity to negotiate the contract terms.

Any negotiations between parties must be meaningful and not minor. Otherwise, a contract is likely to be considered standard form.

Recognisable examples of standard form contracts include: 

  • mobile phone plans; 
  • airline sales terms and conditions; 
  • gym memberships; 
  • information technology licenses; and 
  • online contracts where the party must tick an acceptance box to accept terms and conditions.
Continue reading this article below the form
Loading form

Factors of Unfair Contract Terms

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) works to enforce the ACL. In addition, they provide plenty of guidance on examples of unfair contract terms. 

An unfair term is one that:

  • would cause a significant imbalance in the parties rights and obligations arising under the contract;
  • is not reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the party benefiting from the term; and
  • would cause detriment (financial or otherwise) to a party if applied or relied on.

Examples of Unfair Contract Terms

Let us explores examples of unfair contract terms in the table below. 

ExampleExplanationHow to Avoid this Unfair Term
Unilateral VariationUnilateral variation is where only one party can vary the contract.Providers should give notice of any upcoming changes to the terms (particularly changes that would or could be detrimental to the customer). Customers must be able to terminate the contract without paying any additional fees.
 Hair-Trigger TerminationAllowing one party to terminate for breach of the contract without extending this right to the other party.Firstly, the contract should include grounds for termination. Secondly, both parties should have the opportunity to terminate for breach. Thirdly, the party in breach of the contract should have an opportunity to rectify the breach before the other party can terminate.
Early Termination FeesEarly termination fees will be unfair where they are excessive.Termination fees should not penalise the customer or unjustly enrich the provider. These fees should be a genuine pre-estimate of the loss the provider believes they will suffer due to the customer’s early termination. They should also consider the costs the provider saves in not needing to provide the services after the early termination. 
Automatic Renewal Where the contract automatically renews:
+ before a party has a chance to opt out;
+ where the party has not been notified that the contract is renewing;
+ where the provider can change the cut-off date for the renewal; or
+ where the customer will incur expensive fees if they cancel after the contract has automatically renewed. 
Where the contract automatically renews:
+ before a party has a chance to opt-out;
+ where the party has not been notified that the contract is renewing;
+ where the provider can change the cut-off date for the renewal; or
+ where the customer will incur expensive fees if they cancel after the contract has automatically renewed. 
Limited LiabilityParties may not excessively limit their liability under the contract. The contract should state that any limitation of liability does not limit a customer’s rights under the ACL. 
Misleading Statements About Rights at LawThe contract should not include statements that mislead or confuse customers about their legal rights. The ACL provides mandatory wording to include when expressing customers’ rights under the ACL, particularly where the provider provides warranties against defects

Key Takeaways

Whether you are a small business or a large business, it is vital to understand how the unfair contract terms regime works. This is especially important as the regime will capture more businesses from November 2023. Additionally, larger companies dealing with small businesses need to know what contract terms are permissible and what are at risk of being viewed as unfair.  

If you need assistance with meeting the new legal requirements or negotiating fairer terms in a contract, contact our experienced contract lawyers as part of our LegalVision membership. For a low monthly fee, you will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents. Call us today on 1300 544 755 or visit our membership page.

Register for our free webinars

ACCC Merger Reforms: Key Takeaways for Executives and Legal Counsel

Online
Understand how the ACCC’s merger reforms impact your legal strategy. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Ask an Employment Lawyer: Contracts, Performance and Navigating Dismissals

Online
Ask an employment lawyer your contract, performance and dismissal questions in our free webinar. Register today.
Register Now

Stop Chasing Unpaid Invoices: Payment Terms That Actually Work

Online
Stop chasing late payments with stronger terms and protections. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Managing Psychosocial Risks: Employer and Legal Counsel Responsibilities

Online
Protect your business by managing workplace psychosocial risks. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now
See more webinars >
Elise Willett

Elise Willett

Lawyer | View profile

Elise is a Lawyer at LegalVision with previous experience in Commercial, Corporate and Estate Planning law. She also has experience in the Wealth Management and Finance sector. Elise provides expert advice to commercial clients, particularly startups and SMEs, on a range of commercial matters.

Qualifications: Bachelor of Laws, Bachelor of Arts, University of Sydney, University of Wollongong, Master of Laws, College of Law.

Read all articles by Elise

About LegalVision

LegalVision is an innovative commercial law firm that provides businesses with affordable, unlimited and ongoing legal assistance through our membership. We operate in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Learn more

We’re an award-winning law firm

  • Award

    2025 Future of Legal Services Innovation Finalist - Legal Innovation Awards

  • Award

    2025 Employer of Choice - Australasian Lawyer

  • Award

    2024 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2024 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Modern Law Private Client Awards

  • Award

    2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards