Reading time: 4 minutes

The new year brought a strong warning for franchisors who make false or misleading representations to prospective franchisees. In January 2019,  the Federal Court handed down their decision in an Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) action against franchisor Ultra Tune, finding that Ultra Tune had breached the:

The decision included a hefty $2.6 million penalty. In this article, we will outline what:

  • the decision means for franchisors;
  • it tells us about the good faith requirement; and
  • franchisors should be doing to ensure that they are acting in line with the court’s decision.

Why Should Franchisors Care About This Decision?

For franchisors, the penalty imposed on Ultra Tune is a strong indicator that the courts sympathise with the damaging impact of franchisors misleading prospective franchisees in pre-contractual dealings. The decision also provides insight into when a franchisor will have violated the good faith requirement of the Code.

The Decision

The ACCC’s legal action against Ultra Tune arose as a result of the franchisor’s practices in dealing with a prospective franchisee, including:

  • the failure to comply with mandatory disclosure requirements;
  • the making of false and misleading representations about the Ultra Tune franchise system; and
  • a failure to act in good faith. This means acting honestly, reasonably and fairly. 

In its decision, the court found that Ultra Tune failed on each of these counts in its dealings with a prospective franchisee, Mr Ahmed, concerning the proposed purchase of an Ultra Tune franchise in Parramatta.

In particular, the court found that Ultra Tune had made false and misleading representations to Mr Ahmed about:

  • the length of time the Parramatta franchise had been operating;
  • the total purchase price of that franchise; and
  • whether a $33,000 ‘deposit’ was refundable.

The court ordered Ultra Tune to repay the $33,000 deposit to Mr Ahmed. In addition to this, Ultra Tune were required to pay a $2.6 million fine to the ACCC. 

What Does This Tell Us About the Good Faith Requirement?

This decision gives franchisors a fresh understanding of what they need to do to uphold their good faith obligation. Additionally, the decision significantly builds on previous court decisions on the issue.

It is likely that the following will be considered a failure to act in good faith:

  1. failing to disclose information about the franchise honestly;
  2. making misrepresentations about the franchise;
  3. putting pressure on a prospective franchisee to pay a deposit before providing disclosure documentation;
  4. treating a deposit as non-refundable without the prospective franchisee knowing;
  5. spending deposited money immediately on expenses such as equipment, fit out or signage, without any real urgency;
  6. failing to repay the deposit where a prospective franchisee did not know that the deposit was non-refundable.

Furthermore, the decision demonstrates that what is prohibited by the good faith requirement is conduct that harms the franchisee (or prospective franchisee), where the conduct is not necessary for the protection of the franchisor’s interests.

Checklist for Franchisors

In light of this court decision, franchisors should carefully review their franchisee engagement practices. In particular, franchisors should ensure they:

  1. follow the timeframes imposed by the Code concerning pre-contractual disclosure. A copy of the Code, a disclosure document and the franchise agreement should be provided at least 14 days before the franchisee enters into a franchise agreement or makes a non-refundable payment;
  2. keep the information in their disclosure document and other materials accurate. This especially applies to purchase and establishment costs;
  3. only make representations to prospective franchisees that can be supported by fact. For example, historical records of the franchise;
  4. clearly state whether a deposit is to be refundable or non-refundable;
  5. allow franchisees the opportunity to make inquiries and undertake due diligence before pushing them to sign documents or make a deposit; and
  6. not spend deposited money until the franchise agreement has been executed (and, ideally, the cooling off period has elapsed).

Key Takeaways

While Ultra Tune was ordered to repay the $33,000 deposit to Mr Ahmed, the $2.6 million penalty was payable to the ACCC. This $2.6 million does not represent the ‘loss’ suffered by Mr Ahmed. Rather, it is a penalty for breaching the Code and the ACL. Accordingly, franchisors should be wary that they not only face repaying actual losses arising from violating the Code, but also hefty penalties.

Furthermore, with the upcoming Parliamentary Committee’s Inquiry on the operation and effectiveness of the Franchising Code of Conduct, compliance is more important than ever for franchisors. If you have any questions, contact LegalVision’s franchise lawyers on 1300 544 755 or fill out the form on this page.

Webinars

Construction Contract Essentials

Thursday 12 August | 11:00 - 11:45am

Online
Understand how construction contracts are drafted and how to protect your construction business.
Register Now

Startup 101: Understanding Cap Tables and ESOPs

Thursday 19 August | 11:00 - 11:45am

Online
Cap tables and employee share option plans are essential for fast-growing startups. Learn more with this free webinar.
Register Now

About LegalVision: LegalVision is a tech-driven, full-service commercial law firm that uses technology to deliver a faster, better quality and more cost-effective client experience.

The majority of our clients are LVConnect members. By becoming a member, you can stay ahead of legal issues while staying on top of costs. From just $119 per week, get all your contracts sorted, trade marks registered and questions answered by experienced business lawyers.

Learn more about LVConnect

Need Legal Help? Get a Free Fixed-Fee Quote

If you would like to receive a free fixed-fee quote or get in touch with our team, fill out the form below.

  • 2020 Excellence in Technology & Innovation – Finalist – Australasian Law Awards 2020 Excellence in Technology & Innovation Finalist – Australasian Law Awards
  • 2020 Employer of Choice – Winner – Australasian Lawyer 2020 Employer of Choice Winner – Australasian Lawyer
  • 2021 Fastest Growing Law Firm - Financial Times APAC 500 2021 Fastest Growing Law Firm - Financial Times APAC 500
  • 2020 AFR Fast 100 List - Australian Financial Review 2020 AFR Fast 100 List - Australian Financial Review
  • 2021 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards 2021 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards
  • Most Innovative Law Firm - 2019 Australasian Lawyer 2019 Most Innovative Firm - Australasian Lawyer