Under section 17 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), a trade mark is defined as a sign used, or intended to be used, to distinguish goods or services. Accordingly, a trade mark’s registrability lies in its inherent capacity to distinguish one trader’s goods and/or services from those of others. In fact, under section 41 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), an application must be rejected if the mark in question is not capable of distinguishing. Marks that are recognised as not being able to distinguish are those which indicate the value, quality, kind, intended purposes, geographical origin or some other characteristic of the goods and/or services.

Thus the question arises, what is the registrability of various kinds of marks and, in particular, letter and word marks?

Letter marks

  • Single letter trade marks: will generally not be capable of distinguishing goods and/or services unless they are incorporated into a highly stylised form or have a unique get up.
  • Two letter trade marks: will be capable of distinguishing only if they relate to goods and/or services that are narrow or highly specialised. Alternatively, if the letters are combined in an unusual way, this may in itself be sufficient.
  • Trade marks consisting of three or more letters: will usually be capable of distinguishing a traders goods and/or services from those of other traders unless the words themselves are descriptive in nature.
  • Acronyms and abbreviations: may be capable of distinguishing if they are not commonplace or if they form part of a composite mark. In terms of composite marks, it is the overall impression that the mark conveys that is decisive.
  • Punctuated word trade marks: may or may not be inherently adapted to distinguish. The more letters that are used, the more likely it is that the mark will be considered a word, as opposed to a series of letters, e.g. S.W.A.N would be deemed to read “swan”.

Word marks

  • Trade marks that describe the quality, quantity, value or time of production; of the goods or services in question will not, without more, be capable of distinguishing.
  • Misspellings of words and combinations of known words: words consisting of simple combinations, misspellings or minor changes are not inherently adapted to distinguish. A trade mark that falls within this category may be registered if the word construction contains an appropriate degree of inventiveness.
  • Trade marks that contain words in other languages: will be capable of distinguishing if the non-English word itself is novel. If the word is merely descriptive and well known in Australia, it may fall short of the registrability threshold.
  • Names: trade marks consisting of a person’s name may or may not be capable of distinguishing the trader’s goods and/or services, it all depends on the commonality of the name. Names that have an SFAS value of 750 or more tend to indicate that the name is common and thus, without more, not registrable.

Conclusion

Would you like to know more about the registrability of various types of trade marks? Our team of experienced LegalVision IP lawyers would be happy to assist you with any queries that you may have. Contact us today to see how we can help.

About LegalVision: LegalVision is a tech-driven, full-service commercial law firm that uses technology to deliver a faster, better quality and more cost-effective client experience.
Vanja Simic

Get a Free Quote Now

If you would like to receive a free fixed-fee quote or get in touch with our team, fill out the form below.

  • We will be in touch shortly with a quote. By submitting this form, you agree to receive emails from LegalVision and can unsubscribe at any time. See our full Privacy Policy.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Our Awards

  •  Top 20 Startups in Australia - 2018 LinkedIn Startups List Top 20 Startups in Australia - 2018 LinkedIn Startups List
  • NewLaw Firm of the Year – 2019 Australian Law Awards NewLaw Firm of the Year – 2019 Australian Law Awards
  • Law Firm of the Year Finalist – 2018 Australasian Law Awards Law Firm of the Year Finalist – 2018 Australasian Law Awards
  • AFR Fast 100 List – 2018 Australian Financial Review AFR Fast 100 List – 2018 Australian Financial Review
  • NewLaw Firm of the Year – 2017 Australian Law Awards NewLaw Firm of the Year – 2017 Australian Law Awards
  • Most Innovative Law Firm - 2019 Australasian Lawyer Most Innovative Law Firm - 2019 Australasian Lawyer

Privacy Policy Snapshot

We collect and store information about you. Let us explain why we do this.

What information do you collect?

We collect a range of data about you, including your contact details, legal issues and data on how you use our website.

How do you collect information?

We collect information over the phone, by email and through our website.

What do you do with this information?

We store and use your information to deliver you better legal services. This mostly involves communicating with you, marketing to you and occasionally sharing your information with our partners.

How do I contact you?

You can always see what data you’ve stored with us.

Questions, comments or complaints? Reach out on 1300 544 755 or email us at info@legalvision.com.au

View Privacy Policy