Skip to content

Responding to an Adverse Report

When you file a trade mark application, an examiner from IP Australia will assess whether your trade mark is fit for registration. If the examiner does not accept your application for trade mark registration, you will receive an adverse examination report detailing the reasons for objecting to your application. Some of the most common grounds for objection are that your trade mark lacks distinctiveness, has overly generic terms or is too similar to another registered trade mark or pending trade mark application. This article will discuss why your trade mark application may be rejected and how you can rectify the problems identified in the adverse examination report.

Reasons for an Adverse Report

Lack of Distinctiveness

To be eligible for trade mark registration, your trade mark must be capable of distinguishing your goods and/or services in the marketplace. The more unique your trade mark is, the greater the chance that your trade mark is distinct and memorable to consumers. It will also be easier to allege trade mark infringement and seek legal remedies if a competitor uses the same or similar trade mark to yours.

If your trade mark lacks distinctiveness, it may not be registrable unless you can demonstrate extensive evidence of use. This will illustrate that your trade mark has become a recognisable badge of origin for your business.

When assessing a trade mark’s distinctiveness, examiners will consider factors like its inherent qualities, how it is used, and evidence that consumers recognise it as a trade mark. Thus, a trade mark with “strong” distinctiveness might feature invented words or words that bear no connection to your goods and/or services. For example:

  1. “Polaroid” is an invented word that has now become a distinct and recognisable trade mark.
  2. “Apple” is a word that was originally unrelated to electronic goods but is now related to the famous technology brand.

Both trade marks are memorable and considered ‘inherently distinctive’.

At times, a trade mark, despite not being distinctive, may have adopted a secondary meaning through extensive use and promotion. As a result of this, the brand’s recognition has increased. Provided you can prove that consumers associate the trade mark with your product or service, despite its non-distinctiveness, it may still be possible to achieve registration.

Front page of publication
Trade Mark Essentials

This guide explains the essentials of trade marks and the steps required to register a trade mark.

Download Now

Generic Terms

An examiner may believe your trade mark contains a generic word that traders should be able to use freely. In this case, they will usually issue an adverse report on the same grounds as a non-distinctiveness objection. Generic terms describe the product or services that your trade mark covers. For example, an application for “Computer” will be rejected where the goods you offer under this trade mark are computers or electronic devices, as it is simply their common name. IP Australia will not unfairly prevent other traders from being able to describe their goods and services properly.

However, it is possible to include generic terms within your trade mark as long as other distinctive elements accompany them to distinguish it as a whole. For example, if you run a software development business, you would be unable to register the trade mark “Software”. Still, you may consider including completely unrelated, invented or unique terms in your trade mark to make it memorable in the minds of consumers, for example “Xylophone Software”.

Substantially Identical or Deceptively Similar Trade Marks

You will likely receive an adverse examination report if you attempt to register a similar or identical trade mark to another registered or pending trade mark, covering the same or similar goods and services. The purpose of trade mark protection is to prevent other traders from being able to use identical or deceptively similar trade marks to your own.

Importantly, identical trade marks can coexist for different goods and services. This is how Dove chocolate and Dove soap can coexist without infringing upon the other’s trade mark registration. Consumers are unlikely to believe these entirely different goods come from the same source.

Examiners take many different considerations into account when determining the likelihood of confusion. For example, the examiner will compare your trade marks. They will assess based on the degree of similarity between the trade marks themselves and the goods or services they pertain to.

The examiner may also consider any evidence that the marks have already co-existed in the same marketplace without having caused any consumer confusion. An example of consumer confusion is a consumer mistakenly purchasing one seller’s goods or services in the belief they are from another seller. If two similar marks have existed concurrently for a period of time without documented incidents of consumer confusion, this may be evidence that the marks are capable of being distinguished.

How to Respond to an Adverse Report

An adverse report does not necessarily signal the end of the road for your trade mark application. Adverse examination reports simply indicate why your application cannot be accepted in its current state. Then, you are provided with 15 months to address these issues and remedy them for your application to proceed to acceptance. During this period, you have the opportunity to overcome the objections raised through options such as submissions, amendments or evidence. The most appropriate response will depend upon the reason for the refusal, how long you have been using your trade mark and other considerations. For example, depending on the issues raised, you may take steps to:

  • filing legal submissions or arguments arguing against the examiner’s objections;
  • amend the goods and services you claim in your application;
  • submit evidence of your use of your trade mark; or
  • seek consent from other conflicting trade mark owners.

Responding effectively and persuasively to an adverse report can be complex. We recommend hiring a trademark lawyer at this stage to help you overcome objections.

Continue reading this article below the form
Loading form

Key Takeaways

Your trade mark application may receive an adverse report when a trade mark examiner decides there are obstacles to your application that you must overcome before IP Australia accepts it. The most common reasons are that your trade mark:

  • lacks distinctiveness;
  • contains overly generic terms; or
  • is highly similar or identical to an existing trade mark for the same goods and services.

When responding to an adverse report, you can take several paths, including engaging with IP Australia or contacting any conflicting trademark owners. 

If you have received an adverse report and need assistance with responding, our experienced trade mark lawyers can assist as part of our LegalVision membership. For a low monthly fee, you will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents. Call us today on 1300 544 755 or visit our membership page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I include generic words in my trade mark?

It is possible to include generic words in your trade mark. Still, to achieve registration, you will usually need to include other distinctive elements to make your trade mark registrable.

How long do I have to respond to an adverse report?

You have 15 months from the date of the adverse report to attempt to overcome the issues raised. In some circumstances, a deferral or extension of time may be possible. However, we recommend consulting your trade mark lawyer. 

My trade mark was rejected because it was too similar to an existing trade mark I did not know about. What can I do?

You may be able to overcome this by showing evidence of your honest and concurrent use of your trade mark or seeking the owner’s consent. However, we recommend consulting your trade mark lawyer.

Register for our free webinars

Avoiding NDIS Pitfalls: Key Breaches and How to Prevent Them

Online
Understand NDIS pitfalls and reduce the risk of breaches affecting your business. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Demystifying M&A: What Every Business Owner Should Know

Online
Understand the essentials of mergers and acquisitions and protect your business value. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Social Media Compliance: Safeguard Your Brand and Avoid Common Pitfalls

Online
Avoid legal pitfalls in social media marketing and safeguard your brand. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Building a Strong Startup: Ask a Lawyer and Founder Your Tough Questions

Sydney Office
Join LegalVision and Bluebird at the Spark Festival to ask a lawyer and founder your startup questions. Register now.
Register Now
See more webinars >
Kate Young

Kate Young

Lawyer | View profile

Kate is a Lawyer in LegalVision’s Intellectual Property team, specialising in trade marks.

Qualifications:  Bachelor of Laws, Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice, Bachelor of Economics and Finance, University of Wollongong.

Read all articles by Kate

About LegalVision

LegalVision is an innovative commercial law firm that provides businesses with affordable, unlimited and ongoing legal assistance through our membership. We operate in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Learn more

We’re an award-winning law firm

  • Award

    2025 Future of Legal Services Innovation Finalist - Legal Innovation Awards

  • Award

    2025 Employer of Choice - Australasian Lawyer

  • Award

    2024 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2024 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Modern Law Private Client Awards

  • Award

    2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards