Skip to content

Can I Recover Costs After Withdrawing From a Trade Mark Opposition?

In Short

  • Withdrawing from a trade mark opposition doesn’t automatically mean you’ll incur costs.

  • The Registrar considers various factors, such as the dispute history and any settlement agreements, before awarding costs.

  • Timely withdrawal can help minimise further expenses and avoid increasing cost orders.

Tips for Businesses
If you plan to withdraw from a trade mark opposition, act promptly to limit additional costs. Review any settlement agreements or written confirmations with the other party, as these may affect the cost award. Always consider the dispute’s history and consult a professional to ensure the best outcome when withdrawing.


Table of Contents

In the complex world of intellectual property disputes, trade mark opposition proceedings can be costly and time-consuming. If you have decided to withdraw from such a proceeding, you might wonder about the financial implications. This article explores the possibility of recovering costs in trade mark opposition withdrawals and outlines the key factors influencing cost awards.

Front page of publication
Trade Mark Essentials

This guide explains the essentials of trade marks and the steps required to register a trade mark.

Download Now

Understanding Cost Awards in Trade Mark Disputes

Generally, costs in trade mark disputes are awarded against the unsuccessful party. However, in cases of partial success or withdrawal, the situation can become more nuanced. Cost awards can apply to various types of oppositions, including:

  • opposition to a trade mark registration;
  • opposition to an application to remove a trade mark registration based on non-use; and
  • applications for extensions of time in opposition proceedings.

It is important to note that cost awards are not punitive. The Registrar only awards costs to cover the actual expenses incurred by the successful party, such as:

  • agents’ fees;
  • professional legal representation fees;
  • fees for the proceedings;
  • allowances payable to people summoned to the proceedings; and
  • hearing attendance fees and expenses.

Withdrawing From an Opposition

If you are considering withdrawing from an opposition, timing is crucial. The longer a proceeding continues, the more costs the other party incurs, which may increase the amount you must pay in the cost order. Promptly submitting your withdrawal to IP Australia can help avoid further expenses.

Importantly, unlike court actions, a withdrawal in trade mark proceedings is not considered prejudicial. The Registrar generally does not view withdrawal alone as sufficient grounds for awarding costs.

Continue reading this article below the form
Loading form

Factors Influencing Cost Awards in Withdrawals

When determining whether to award costs in a withdrawal scenario, the Registrar considers several factors, including:

  • the existence of a Deed of Settlement between parties, as this may outline financial payment terms;
  • any written confirmation of an agreement on costs between parties; and
  • written submissions outlining exceptional circumstances justifying a cost order. This could, for example, include the non-appearance or disappearance of the other party.

When deciding to withdraw from a trade mark opposition, it is essential to consider the history of the dispute.

Notify IP Australia as soon as possible if you and the other party have reached a consensus to withdraw from the proceedings and sign an agreement. It is best practice to outline the terms of financial compensation you will receive for not proceeding to court over the dispute.

Exceptions

Costs are usually awarded against the unsuccessful party, though there are exceptions. Since the opposition process is part of the registration procedure, evaluating conflicting claims is inherent to this process, with oppositions regarded as a fundamental element.

Where the parties to the dispute have no issues remaining except the question of costs generally, the Registrar will ordinarily make no orders to costs unless:

  • one party acted unreasonably, justifying a cost award to the other party; or
  • both parties acted reasonably, but one party would have almost certainly succeeded if the matter had proceeded to a full hearing.

Extension of Time Hearings

The Registrar can also award costs associated with hearings held for an extension of time. The costs awarded in these circumstances are generally awarded against the unsuccessful party in the extension of time matter, regardless of the outcome of the hearing of the actual dispute.

If the extension of time only came because of something that was disclosed at the hearing, then costs might be awarded against the successful party.

Key Takeaways

Withdrawing from a trade mark opposition does not automatically mean you will be liable for the other party’s costs. The Registrar considers various factors when deciding on cost awards, including the history of the dispute and any agreements between the parties. When withdrawing, you should carefully review the communications between the disputing parties and take into account any important documents that might outline the terms of financial compensation, such as the settlement deed.

If you need help withdrawing from a trade mark opposition, our experienced IP lawyers can assist as part of our LegalVision membership. You will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents for a low monthly fee. Call us today on 1300 544 755 or visit our membership page

Frequently Asked Questions

How soon should I notify IP Australia if I decide to withdraw from an opposition?

You should notify IP Australia as soon as possible. Prompt notification can limit further expenses incurred by the other party, which would otherwise increase the amount you must pay in the cost order.

Does withdrawing from a trade mark opposition mean I’ll automatically have to pay the other party’s costs?

No, withdrawing does not automatically result in a cost order against you. Before deciding on cost awards, the Registrar considers various factors, including the dispute’s history and any agreements between parties.

Register for our free webinars

ACCC Merger Reforms: Key Takeaways for Executives and Legal Counsel

Online
Understand how the ACCC’s merger reforms impact your legal strategy. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Ask an Employment Lawyer: Contracts, Performance and Navigating Dismissals

Online
Ask an employment lawyer your contract, performance and dismissal questions in our free webinar. Register today.
Register Now

Stop Chasing Unpaid Invoices: Payment Terms That Actually Work

Online
Stop chasing late payments with stronger terms and protections. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Managing Psychosocial Risks: Employer and Legal Counsel Responsibilities

Online
Protect your business by managing workplace psychosocial risks. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now
See more webinars >
Kate Young

Kate Young

Lawyer | View profile

Kate is a Lawyer in LegalVision’s Intellectual Property team, specialising in trade marks.

Qualifications:  Bachelor of Laws, Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice, Bachelor of Economics and Finance, University of Wollongong.

Read all articles by Kate

About LegalVision

LegalVision is an innovative commercial law firm that provides businesses with affordable, unlimited and ongoing legal assistance through our membership. We operate in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Learn more

We’re an award-winning law firm

  • Award

    2025 Future of Legal Services Innovation Finalist - Legal Innovation Awards

  • Award

    2025 Employer of Choice - Australasian Lawyer

  • Award

    2024 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2024 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Modern Law Private Client Awards

  • Award

    2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards