In November 2017, radio station Triple J made headlines by announcing that their annual “Hottest 100” countdown of the year’s most popular songs would no longer be broadcast on Australia Day. The move came after scrutiny over how Australia Day was celebrated. The decision was based on a Triple J survey where around 60 percent of participants voted to change the date of the countdown.

There has been a lot of public comment both in support of and against the decision. However, one of the more interesting responses was from rival radio station Triple M. In December, Triple M announced that they would be broadcasting a countdown on Australia Day with a similar format to the Hottest 100, dubbed the “Ozzest 100”.

Political debate aside, the move by Triple M poses an interesting question about branding and intellectual property rights. Namely, is Triple M infringing on Triple J’s intellectual property (IP) by coming up with a similar concept that has a similar name?

The Potential IP Rights

IP rights take a number of forms and can include trade marks, copyright, patents and designs. For the “Hottest 100”, the most relevant IP is the trade mark. A trade mark is a symbol, logo, name or word that is used to represent a brand. They are used to distinguish the goods and services of one business from another. To protect a trade mark in Australia, you need to first apply for the mark and have it registered with IP Australia.

Searching the IP Australia Trade Mark register reveals that The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) — who owns Triple J, has a registered trade mark for “Hottest 100”. So far, the company that owns Triple M, Southern Cross Austereo Pty Ltd (SCA), has not applied for a trade mark for “Ozzest 100”.

A Possible Legal Conflict

The ABC may form the view that “Ozzest 100” infringes on their IP rights to “Hottest 100”. By having the registered trade mark for “Hottest 100”, the ABC has the right to use the mark exclusively. This means they can stop others from using the same or similar name for a similar set of goods and services (like another radio feature). One potential argument that the ABC might consider is whether SCA’s mark is deceptively similar.

The argument that a mark is deceptively similar will win if it can be shown that there is a strong resemblance between the registered trade mark and the potentially infringing mark. This requires a comparison of the marks to discern their similarities and differences. Ultimately, the “overall impression” of the potentially infringing mark is what determines whether the marks are too similar.

A brand does not need to have deceived customers intentionally. What is required, however, is a likelihood of the mark misleading a consumer. This depends on factors such as similarities in visual impressions or whether the two marks are phonetically similar.

“Ozzest 100” has obvious similarities to “Hottest 100”. Therefore, the ABC could make an argument that it would mislead consumers.

SCA would contend that the similarities do not go so far as to being misleading. It would be an interesting argument for both the ABC and SCA to pursue, but without the determination of IP Australia or a court, it is hard to speculate at this stage what the outcome would be.


The brand recognition of the ABC’s “Hottest 100” can be argued to be synonymous with Australia Day for a certain generation of listeners. The fact that the move has been made to change the date of the program and that SCA has indicated they will run a similar show with a similar name has the potential to degenerate into a legal skirmish.

The ABC’s registration of “Hottest 100” indicates that as a business, the ABC sees enough value in that brand to make attempts to protect it. The protection afforded by a registered trade mark means that the ABC can enforce their rights against other businesses that try to develop brands that are exactly the same or deceptively similar.

The question in this situation is whether or not a consumer would be fooled into thinking that “Ozzest 100” was somehow the same or similar to “Hottest 100”. If the ABC is able to prove all the elements required to enforce their trade mark, the “Ozzest 100” could potentially be stopped before the countdown even starts.


What are your thoughts on the Ozzest 100? Let us know on Twitter by tagging @legalvision_au

COVID-19 Business Survey
LegalVision is conducting a survey on the impact of COVID-19 for businesses across Australia. The survey takes 2 minutes to complete and all responses are anonymous. We would appreciate your input. Take the survey now.

About LegalVision: LegalVision is a tech-driven, full-service commercial law firm that uses technology to deliver a faster, better quality and more cost-effective client experience.

The majority of our clients are LVConnect members. By becoming a member, you can stay ahead of legal issues while staying on top of costs. For just $199 per month, membership unlocks unlimited lawyer consultations, faster turnaround times, free legal templates and members-only discounts.

Learn more about LVConnect

Christopher Mittiga
Need Legal Help? Get a Free Fixed-Fee Quote

If you would like to receive a free fixed-fee quote or get in touch with our team, fill out the form below.

  • By submitting this form, you agree to receive emails from LegalVision and can unsubscribe at any time. See our full Privacy Policy.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Our Awards
  • 2019 Top 25 Startups - LinkedIn 2019 Top 25 Startups - LinkedIn
  • 2019 NewLaw Firm of the Year - Australian Law Awards 2019 NewLaw Firm of the Year - Australian Law Awards
  • 2020 Fastest Growing Law Firm - Financial Times APAC 500 2020 Fastest Growing Law Firm - Financial Times APAC 500
  • 2020 AFR Fast 100 List - Australian Financial Review 2020 AFR Fast 100 List - Australian Financial Review
  • 2020 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Australasian Law Awards 2020 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Australasian Law Awards
  • Most Innovative Law Firm - 2019 Australasian Lawyer 2019 Most Innovative Firm - Australasian Lawyer
Privacy Policy Snapshot

We collect and store information about you. Let us explain why we do this.

What information do you collect?

We collect a range of data about you, including your contact details, legal issues and data on how you use our website.

How do you collect information?

We collect information over the phone, by email and through our website.

What do you do with this information?

We store and use your information to deliver you better legal services. This mostly involves communicating with you, marketing to you and occasionally sharing your information with our partners.

How do I contact you?

You can always see what data you’ve stored with us.

Questions, comments or complaints? Reach out on 1300 544 755 or email us at

View Privacy Policy