Commercial contracts often include clauses outlining the process to resolve disputes between parties. Typically, this involves a requirement to negotiate with the other party before commencing any court proceedings. However, there may also be provisions that allow the parties to appoint an arbitrator or mediator to resolve a dispute. In this article, we will explain how two contracting parties might use mediation and arbitration to resolve a commercial dispute.
What is the Difference Between Mediation and Arbitration?
Independent third parties are present in both mediation and arbitration to assist with dispute resolution.
In a mediation, a mediator encourages disputing parties to achieve a commercial resolution in an informal setting. If the parties reach a decision, they have the option to sign a legal agreement outlining the resolution.
Arbitration involves the appointment of an independent third party (the arbitrator) to make a decision on the dispute. This method requires each party to present their evidence and testimony in an arbitration proceeding. Typically, the parties will also agree to treat the arbitrator’s final decision as binding.
Why Would a Party Choose to Mediate
Mediation is a fast, business-friendly and cost-efficient alternative to try to reach an agreement. A person might choose to mediate because of its:
|Cost||The mediation normally concludes within a day and the parties will only have to pay for their own costs, plus the fee for the mediator.|
If you take a matter to court, you could face delays. You may need to wait months before receiving a court date, and once decided, there is little flexibility. This is impractical for time-sensitive disputes that need a quick resolution.
A mediation meeting is generally quick to organise and hold. Usually mediation concludes in less than a day and requires minimal preparation.
|Autonomy||The parties compromise and reach an agreement themselves. Unlike court or arbitration, there is no third party making decisions which lead to one winner and one loser. Both parties collaborate to reach the most satisfactory outcome.|
|International Applicability||As the mediator focuses on finding a resolution that is acceptable to all involved, the parties can quickly return to business as usual if an agreement can be reached. Given the collaborative nature of mediation, the parties do not have to sacrifice their business relationship to find a solution.|
Why Would a Party Choose to Arbitrate?
There are many advantages to choosing arbitration over commencing to court. Some of these are similar to mediation, while others are unique to arbitration. Overall, the benefits include its:
|Cost||Arbitration is often a cost-effective method of resolving disputes, although you do have the additional burden of paying the arbitrator — an expense not paid in court proceedings.|
|Efficiency||An arbitration occurs soon after you appoint an arbitrator, according to your availability.
|Privacy||The decision reached and the names of the parties involved are kept private in arbitration. This provides both parties with privacy as to their commercial affairs and the dispute in question.|
Matters in Australia resolved through arbitration will be recognised by over 150 countries.
Similarly, Australia will recognise any arbitration decided in those countries. This makes arbitration a useful and efficient method for international dispute resolution.
Can Arbitration Help with International Disputes?
Arbitration can also be a useful tool in ensuring that the outcome of a dispute receives global recognition.
The Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration (ACICA) is a dispute resolution body that offers arbitration and mediation services. A commercial contract can specify that ACICA will administer a mediation or arbitration session, meaning the relevant ACICA Rules will apply to the proceedings.
ACICA is also the only institution appointed as an arbitrator according to the International Arbitration Act. Further, this law allows Australia to enforce international arbitration outcomes.
Arbitration and mediation are alternative dispute resolution methods that may have several advantages for commercial parties entering into a contract. Prior to entering into a contract, businesses should consider the best ways to resolve potential disputes, especially if the parties are located in different countries.
When you are drafting a dispute resolution clause, you should also consider:
- the potential risks of the dispute;
- the possible outcomes; and
- their likelihood of enforcement.
If you’re facing a commercial dispute or need advice drafting a dispute resolution clause, get in touch with LegalVision’s dispute resolution lawyers on 1300 544 755 or fill out the form on this page.
Was this article helpful?
We appreciate your feedback – your submission has been successfully received.