Many businesses have difficulty choosing a brand that appropriately identifies what they do while still being something that can be protected. It is often difficult to register trademarks that are descriptive, and even if they are registered issues arise when trying to enforce them.[1] This is because trademarks that are descriptive are generally not sufficiently capable of distinguishing the goods or services from those of other traders.

So what sorts of brands are easier to protect? When selecting a brand, consider following:

Made up, or Invented Words

Consider some famous brands that have made up words in their names. The classic example is KODAK. George Eastman, the founder of the Eastman Kodak Company, stated, when selecting his brand “I knew a trade name must be short, vigorous, incapable of being misspelled to an extent that will destroy its identity, and, in order to satisfy the trademark laws, it must mean nothing”.[2]

As an invented word, KODAK has no dictionary meaning. Adopting a similar approach, that is, making up your own word for your brand, is the best strategy because it offers the broadest and most easily enforced form of protection. As KODAK shows, it can also be memorable, sound good, and be a good basis for building a strong reputation.

Unrelated words

Another approach to selecting a brand is to choose words that are completely unrelated to your business. Consider APPLE for computers or MONGOOSE for bicycles. Neither of these words convey anything to do with the products with which they are associated, but both are memorable, instantly recognisable, and importantly, protectable brands. Bear in mind, however, that registering a trademark containing commonly used words would not enable you to stop others from using those words to describe other goods/services.

Unique person names

Do you have a unique name? The commonness of a surname will be used as an indicator to determine whether a trademark is sufficiently capable of distinguishing the goods or services. As a general rule IP Australia considers a name that occurs more than 750 times sufficiently common to warrant a ground for rejection of a trademark application. However, if the goods or services are sufficiently specialised (for example helicopter design services), the threshold of ‘commonness’ may be higher.

Things to avoid

Where possible, it’s best to avoid using a name that describes the goods or services being sold. Some examples are below:

Suggestive names

This category includes names that are suggestive of the goods or services being sold, while not being entirely descriptive. While it’s not always the case that these marks will be refused, you’ll need to consider whether other traders selling similar products are likely to want to use those words in that combination to sell their own products.[3]

Merely Descriptive Marks

Descriptive words may be statements about the quality of the products (e.g. FRESH DONUTS), their location or geographic origin (e.g. SYDNEY LAWYERS), or just generic terms used for those products (e.g. CLOCK for timekeeping devices). In cases where your trademark does nothing more than describe your products, it may be difficult to register. As with suggestive names, think about whether your competitors are likely to want to (innocently) use those words to describe their own goods or services. If they are, in most cases you would need to provide substantial evidence of use (or intended use) demonstrating that when people think of those words, they think of your business and your business alone, and the more likely people are to want to use those words the more evidence will be required.[4] Even then, your protection may be limited to the region in which you have a reputation.[5]


Coming up with a brand that is both marketable and protectable is challenging. Even if you do come up with something that sounds good, is catchy, clear, and works well on the Internet, if you can’t protect it, you may run into problems in the future. By considering the issues discussed in this article, you’ll hopefully be on track to ensuring your brand is better protected for the long term.

For more guidance on protecting your trademark, it may be worth speaking with an IP lawyer at LegalVision.


Lift Shop Pty Ltd v Easy Living Home Elevators Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 75.!article=336892

Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks (1964) 111 CLR 511.

Cantarella Bros Pty Limited v Modena Trading Pty Limited [2013] FCA 8.

Re Application By The College of Law Pty Ltd (1999) 47 IPR 404.

Other Sources:

IP Australia Trade Marks Examiner’s manual:

International Trademark Association, Fact Sheets: Selecting and Registering a Trademark

[1] For example, see Lift Shop Pty Ltd v Easy Living Home Elevators Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 75.

[2] Helm, Merry (October 11, 2003). “Kodak from Nodak-David Houston”. Dakota datebook. Prairie public.

[3] Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks (1964) 111 CLR 511.

[4] IP Australia, Trade Marks Office Manual of Practice & Procedure, Part 23, 4 “Examining evidence – general” (1 November 2013).

[5] For example, see Re Application By The College of Law Pty Ltd (1999) 47 IPR 404.

COVID-19 Business Survey
LegalVision is conducting a survey on the impact of COVID-19 for businesses across Australia. The survey takes 2 minutes to complete and all responses are anonymous. We would appreciate your input. Take the survey now.

About LegalVision: LegalVision is a tech-driven, full-service commercial law firm that uses technology to deliver a faster, better quality and more cost-effective client experience.

The majority of our clients are LVConnect members. By becoming a member, you can stay ahead of legal issues while staying on top of costs. For just $199 per month, membership unlocks unlimited lawyer consultations, faster turnaround times, free legal templates and members-only discounts.

Learn more about LVConnect

Daniel Smith
Need Legal Help? Get a Free Fixed-Fee Quote

If you would like to receive a free fixed-fee quote or get in touch with our team, fill out the form below.

  • By submitting this form, you agree to receive emails from LegalVision and can unsubscribe at any time. See our full Privacy Policy.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Our Awards
  • 2019 Top 25 Startups - LinkedIn 2019 Top 25 Startups - LinkedIn
  • 2019 NewLaw Firm of the Year - Australian Law Awards 2019 NewLaw Firm of the Year - Australian Law Awards
  • 2020 Fastest Growing Law Firm - Financial Times APAC 500 2020 Fastest Growing Law Firm - Financial Times APAC 500
  • 2020 AFR Fast 100 List - Australian Financial Review 2020 AFR Fast 100 List - Australian Financial Review
  • 2020 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Australasian Law Awards 2020 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Australasian Law Awards
  • Most Innovative Law Firm - 2019 Australasian Lawyer 2019 Most Innovative Firm - Australasian Lawyer
Privacy Policy Snapshot

We collect and store information about you. Let us explain why we do this.

What information do you collect?

We collect a range of data about you, including your contact details, legal issues and data on how you use our website.

How do you collect information?

We collect information over the phone, by email and through our website.

What do you do with this information?

We store and use your information to deliver you better legal services. This mostly involves communicating with you, marketing to you and occasionally sharing your information with our partners.

How do I contact you?

You can always see what data you’ve stored with us.

Questions, comments or complaints? Reach out on 1300 544 755 or email us at

View Privacy Policy