Skip to content

Can I Enforce an Agreement With a Child?

A child (or minor) is anyone below the age of 18 years of age. Before entering an agreement with a child, you should be aware of whether or not you can enforce that agreement. In Australia, excluding NSW and SA, there are two clearly defined categories of agreements valid and enforceable against a child. These are an agreement for the supply of necessaries and a beneficial contract of service. This article will explore when an agreement with a child is enforceable.

Supply of Necessaries (Excluding NSW and SA)

This is an agreement where you agree to supply the child with goods or services. This kind of agreement will be enforceable against the child if those goods or services are necessary. That is, they are suitable to maintain the child in question at the standard of living and in the position in life which that child currently enjoys. In deciding whether or not the goods or services are necessary, a court will consider what the child’s actual requirements are at the time of sale and delivery. It is important to note that the goods or services must be necessary during sale and delivery.

Example: An agreement for a child to buy a bike because they need it to ride to school will likely be enforceable. If the child were buying the bike to be used on the weekends while playing, the agreement for the bike is unlikely to be enforceable. This is because the bike is not “necessary” for the child.

If the agreement is not one for the supply of necessaries, then the child does not have to pay for the goods or services or return them. Unless they obtained the goods or services by fraud. 

Furthermore, even if the goods or services are necessaries, the child does not have to pay the contract price, only a reasonable price.

Beneficial Contract of Service (Excluding NSW and SA)

A beneficial contract may include a contract of employment or apprenticeship which is beneficial to the child. 

The main question when deciding whether an agreement is a beneficial contract of service and enforceable is whether the agreement as a whole, including any restrictions placed on the child now and in the future, is beneficial to the child. If the contract is more beneficial than detrimental to the child, it will probably be enforceable. There are exceptions to this rule and you should consider each case individually.

Continue reading this article below the form
Loading form

Other Agreements (Excluding NSW and SA)

Certain agreements are enforceable against a child unless the child indicates they do not intend for the agreement to be binding. These agreements involve a continuing obligation, for example, a lease or a shareholder agreement.

In Victoria, agreements that do not have a continuing obligation and are not for the purchase of necessaries, will not be enforceable against the child. Furthermore, such agreements will only be enforceable if the child gives formal consent within a reasonable time after turning 18 that they will be bound by the agreement.

Note: In Victoria, unenforceable agreements with a child include:

  • the repayment of money lent or to be lent to a child;
  • payment of goods supplied or to be supplied (other than necessaries); 
  • repayment of a contractual debt incurred when the child was under the age of 18; and
  • all accounts agreed to be correct between the child and the other party.

An agreement will not be enforceable against a child if they provide security under the agreement for an advance. This includes an agreement for necessaries.

Child Agreements in NSW

The enforceability of an agreement will depend on whether the child engaged in a civil act. For example, this may include:

  • a contract;
  • an election to rescind or determine a contract for fraud, mistake or breach;
  • an assent to or waiver of any matter affecting the child’s rights and obligations under a contract or relating to property; and
  • any other act relating to contractual/proprietary rights or obligations.

If a child participates in a civil act and that participation is for the child’s benefit, the act will be binding as though the child were an adult. Certain acts are binding even though they may not benefit the child. For example, where a child disposes of property for consideration which is not manifestly inadequate, and the child receives at least part of the consideration.

A child is not bound by a civil act where, because of their youth they lack the understanding necessary for participation in such an act.

Additionally, a child may be able to indicate his or her intention not to be bound by the civil act before they turn 19, in which case the civil act will not be enforceable. However, a child cannot do this if, when the child indicates their intention not to be bound, the civil act is for the child’s benefit.

Key Takeaways

In summary, whether or not an agreement with a child will be enforceable depends on a variety of factors. This includes the nature of the agreement and where the child is. Even if the agreement is enforceable, the child may not have to pay the full contract price, only a reasonable price. Furthermore, a child may repudiate an agreement, even if it is valid. This means the child may choose not to be bound by the agreement meaning it is no longer enforceable. 

If you need help enforcing an agreement with a child, our experienced contract lawyers can assist as part of our LegalVision membership. For a low monthly fee, you will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents. Call us today on 1300 544 755 or visit our membership page.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are necessaries?

Necessaries are goods or services that maintain the child in question at the standard of living and in the position in life which that child currently enjoys. 

What does ‘beneficial’ mean in an agreement with a child?

In essence, this refers to whether the contract benefits the child. When deciding whether an agreement is a beneficial contract of service and enforceable, consider whether the agreement as a whole, including any restrictions placed on the child now and in the future, is beneficial to the child. 

Register for our free webinars

ACCC Merger Reforms: Key Takeaways for Executives and Legal Counsel

Online
Understand how the ACCC’s merger reforms impact your legal strategy. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Ask an Employment Lawyer: Contracts, Performance and Navigating Dismissals

Online
Ask an employment lawyer your contract, performance and dismissal questions in our free webinar. Register today.
Register Now

Stop Chasing Unpaid Invoices: Payment Terms That Actually Work

Online
Stop chasing late payments with stronger terms and protections. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Managing Psychosocial Risks: Employer and Legal Counsel Responsibilities

Online
Protect your business by managing workplace psychosocial risks. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now
See more webinars >
Nastassya Naude

Nastassya Naude

Read all articles by Nastassya

About LegalVision

LegalVision is an innovative commercial law firm that provides businesses with affordable, unlimited and ongoing legal assistance through our membership. We operate in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Learn more

We’re an award-winning law firm

  • Award

    2025 Future of Legal Services Innovation Finalist - Legal Innovation Awards

  • Award

    2025 Employer of Choice - Australasian Lawyer

  • Award

    2024 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2024 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Modern Law Private Client Awards

  • Award

    2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards