Skip to content

ACCC Accepts Metcash’s Court Enforceable Undertaking

On 21 July 2016, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) announced that it will not oppose a bid from Metcash to acquire hardware wholesaler Home Timber and Hardware Group (HTHG). The ACCC was initially concerned by Metcash’s bid but remains reassured after considering and accepting Metcash’s court enforceable undertaking.

Unfair Competition in the Hardware Industry

In May this year, Metcash’s proposal to acquire Woolworths’ HTHG rang alarm bells with the ACCC. The ACCC’s concern was that the transaction would breach section 50 of the Competition and Consumer Act (Cth) (CCA), whereby the acquisition would “substantially lessen competition” in Australia’s hardware and home improvement industry.

The effect of the acquisition meant the Metcash would have a stake in over 100 retail stores in which it sells its wholesale products. The primary concern was that the acquisition would lock independent retailers into buying hardware from one wholesaler, Metcash.

The Undertaking

An undertaking is when the undertaking party promises the court that it will take and refrain from taking certain actions. If is a court enforceable undertaking as the effect of it is the same as a court order. While the ACCC was reviewing the deal, Metcash submitted a draft undertaking (which is 23 pages long) in an attempt to negate any anti-competition concerns held by the ACCC.

In receiving the undertaking, the ACCC extended its initial review period to consider adequately the undertaking and to receive feedback from stakeholders and interested parties.

Some interesting points from the undertaking are summarised below:

  1. The undertaking will last for at least ten years, starting from 21 July 2016, unless the ACCC revokes the undertaking or Metcash requests to withdraw the undertaking and the ACCC consents to the withdrawal.
  2. Metcash undertakes to treat the retailers it does have and does not have a stake in, equally.
  3. Retailers that Metcash would have an interest in, as well as all other retailers, are not required to purchase through Metcash or a warehouse maintained by Metcash
  4. Metcash will provide details or notice of the undertaking to relevant retailers, stakeholders and its staff in plain English.

Outcome of Written Undertaking

Section 87B of the CCA provides the ACCC with a statutory power to accept a written undertaking. The ACCC was satisfied that the undertaking addressed the ACCC’s concerns and consequently accepted the undertaking. In making its decision, the ACCC noted the following:

  1. The undertaking will prevent Metcash from barring out the wholesale alternatives. As stated above, it does this by promising to lift, now redundant, provisions that restricted its wholesale hardware customers from buying goods anywhere but from Metcash.
  2. The undertaking includes “non-discriminatory” provisions. As mentioned above, these rules will prohibit Metcash from favouring retailers that Metcash has a stake in, from the retailers they don’t have an interest in.
  3. There are other ways for manufacturers and importers to distribute their products, in addition to Metcash.
Continue reading this article below the form
Loading form

What if Metcash Breaches the Undertaking?

If Metcash violates any provisions in the undertaking, the ACCC has an avenue to apply to the Federal Court of Australia to make individual orders. These orders can be any order the Court sees fit, and can be any, or all, of the following:

  1. Compel Metcash to comply with a provision in the undertaking.
  2. Direct Metcash to remunerate any loss of damage that came about from their breach.
  3. Direct Metcash to pay the Commonwealth the amount of the financial benefit.

Woolworths Hasn’t Even Accepted Metcash’s Bid

Woolworths has received bids from other hopefuls who wish to purchase HTHG. It is yet to accept any. With the ACCC’s approval of the above undertaking, Metcash is one step closer to acquiring HTHG.

Metcash’s Court Enforceable Undertaking: Key Takeaways

In summary, Metcash sought informal clearance to acquire HTHG from Woolworths. Both Metcash and HTHG have wholesale and retail operations in the hardware and home improvement industry, and the ACCC was concerned that this acquisition would reduce the number of businesses in wholesale and impact the supply and demand of wholesale products

LegalVision cannot provide legal assistance with competition law. We recommend you contact your local law society.

Register for our free webinars

Avoiding NDIS Pitfalls: Key Breaches and How to Prevent Them

Online
Understand NDIS pitfalls and reduce the risk of breaches affecting your business. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Demystifying M&A: What Every Business Owner Should Know

Online
Understand the essentials of mergers and acquisitions and protect your business value. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Social Media Compliance: Safeguard Your Brand and Avoid Common Pitfalls

Online
Avoid legal pitfalls in social media marketing and safeguard your brand. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

Building a Strong Startup: Ask a Lawyer and Founder Your Tough Questions

Sydney Office
Join LegalVision and Bluebird at the Spark Festival to ask a lawyer and founder your startup questions. Register now.
Register Now
See more webinars >
Esther Mistarz

Esther Mistarz

Read all articles by Esther

About LegalVision

LegalVision is an innovative commercial law firm that provides businesses with affordable, unlimited and ongoing legal assistance through our membership. We operate in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Learn more

We’re an award-winning law firm

  • Award

    2025 Future of Legal Services Innovation Finalist - Legal Innovation Awards

  • Award

    2025 Employer of Choice - Australasian Lawyer

  • Award

    2024 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2024 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Modern Law Private Client Awards

  • Award

    2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards