The Trade Marks Act 1995 sets out a list of grounds for rejecting an application in sections 39 to 44. We’ve previously published on the most commonly invoked reasons for rejecting a trade mark, but there are other reasons a trademark application may be refused:

39. Trade mark containing etc. certain signs

40. Trade mark that cannot be represented graphically

42. Trade mark scandalous or its use contrary to law

43. Trade mark likely to deceive or cause confusion

Section 39: Prohibited or prescribed signs

There are no signs that are currently categorically prohibited under section 18 of the Trade Marks Act (which allows for regulation that certain signs are not to be used as trademarks), however some marks may be refused registration because they are similar to the following:

  • The words “Patent”, “Registered”, “Copyright”, “Protected International Trade Mark” the (amongst similar others);
  • “To counterfeit this is a forgery”, or words to the same effect;
  • The Arms, flag, or seal of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory;
  • The Arms or emblem of an Australian city or town, or of a public institution or authority;
  • Signs prescribed by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), including:

–   Flags/coats of arms of member states/countries

–   Emblems, badges etc of intergovernmental organisations

–   Badges of warranty and control, including hallmarks.

  • Other specifically prescribed signs under schedule 2 of the Trade Marks Regulations:

–   Austrade

–   C.E.S.

–   Olympic Champion

–   Repatriation

–   Returned Airman

–   Returned Sailor

–   Returned Soldier

Section 40: Signs that cannot be represented graphically

This mainly applies to non-traditional type trademarks, for example shapes, sounds, colours, movements, or gestures. For these marks, the application must include a clear and concise description of the sign that is the subject of the application.

Section 42: Scandalous or illegal trade marks.

A trademark application might be rejected for being too scandalous or reprehensible. It’s important to understand what kinds of applications might be rejected and for what reasons. After all, scandalous is so subjective that it could cover any range of issues and could change over time.

Section 43: Deceptive or confusing trade marks

Under the Trade Marks Act 1995, a trademark may be ‘deceptively similar’ or ‘likely to cause confusion’ if there is a very close resemblance to another mark. Trademarks that are very similar might lead to consumers buying the wrong product, which weakens the unpurchased brand’s unique identity. Those traders who copy other traders’ marks are essentially ‘free-loading’ off another trader’s built-up reputation.

To determine whether two marks are deceptively similar, they must be assessed side by side and in their entirety.


If you’re looking to register a trademark, whether it’s a word, slogan, or something else, contact LegalVision on 1300 544 755 to speak with one of our trade mark law experts. There are numerous grounds on which a trademark application can be rejected and it’s important you understand what needs to be done to avoid this.

COVID-19 Business Survey
LegalVision is conducting a survey on the impact of COVID-19 for businesses across Australia. The survey takes 2 minutes to complete and all responses are anonymous. We would appreciate your input. Take the survey now.

About LegalVision: LegalVision is a tech-driven, full-service commercial law firm that uses technology to deliver a faster, better quality and more cost-effective client experience.

The majority of our clients are LVConnect members. By becoming a member, you can stay ahead of legal issues while staying on top of costs. For just $199 per month, membership unlocks unlimited lawyer consultations, faster turnaround times, free legal templates and members-only discounts.

Learn more about LVConnect

Daniel Smith
Need Legal Help? Get a Free Fixed-Fee Quote

If you would like to receive a free fixed-fee quote or get in touch with our team, fill out the form below.

  • By submitting this form, you agree to receive emails from LegalVision and can unsubscribe at any time. See our full Privacy Policy.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Our Awards
  • 2019 Top 25 Startups - LinkedIn 2019 Top 25 Startups - LinkedIn
  • 2019 NewLaw Firm of the Year - Australian Law Awards 2019 NewLaw Firm of the Year - Australian Law Awards
  • 2020 Fastest Growing Law Firm - Financial Times APAC 500 2020 Fastest Growing Law Firm - Financial Times APAC 500
  • 2020 AFR Fast 100 List - Australian Financial Review 2020 AFR Fast 100 List - Australian Financial Review
  • 2020 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Australasian Law Awards 2020 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Australasian Law Awards
  • Most Innovative Law Firm - 2019 Australasian Lawyer 2019 Most Innovative Firm - Australasian Lawyer
Privacy Policy Snapshot

We collect and store information about you. Let us explain why we do this.

What information do you collect?

We collect a range of data about you, including your contact details, legal issues and data on how you use our website.

How do you collect information?

We collect information over the phone, by email and through our website.

What do you do with this information?

We store and use your information to deliver you better legal services. This mostly involves communicating with you, marketing to you and occasionally sharing your information with our partners.

How do I contact you?

You can always see what data you’ve stored with us.

Questions, comments or complaints? Reach out on 1300 544 755 or email us at

View Privacy Policy